At this point the trial was scheduled to start on 28 January 2008.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based     17

parties being summoned, and the judge determined the victim’s responsibility for the accident even though the said judge did not act as a trial court.

The Supreme Court also ordered that fresh proceedings be conducted by a trial panel composed of different judges.

The applicants allege that their pre-trial detention violated Article   5   §§   1 and 3 of the Convention.

The District Court ordered that any kind of recording of the trial by the public was prohibited.

UN ACORD RELATIF A LA MISE EN PLACE DU TRAVIAL EN CONTINU

and read out at the trial.

the applicant was charged with attempted robbery and committed for trial before the Crown Court.

    The applicant’s pre-trial detention 8 .

of the original trial.

The applicant alleged that the investigating judge who had ordered his pre-trial detention had taken part in the criminal proceedings as a judge member of the trial court.

On 23 March 2009 the victim finally appeared at the trial.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based     2451/22 06/12

During the trial at the Tbilisi Court of Appeal, in accordance with Article 364 § 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (see paragraph 40 below), the defence adduced in evidence two alternative forensic

On 29 December 2004 the case was referred to the Regional Court for trial. B.     Trial 9.

According to the applicant, on 18 March 2010 he was placed in pre-trial detention.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements his conviction was based.

The applicant then stood trial before a new trial judge.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based.