CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1206JUD001807204
6 décembre 2011
Russia , The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, President, Anatoly Kovler, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,
Page 61 sur 100
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0914DEC002544606
14 septembre 2010
The applicants have also constructed a small building used as a prayer house.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0622JUD004135598
22 juin 2010
16219/90, § 20, 31 July 2003, and Alexandrou v. Turkey (merits), no. 16162/90, § 21, 20 January 2009) or at a later stage.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0709DEC002010615
9 juillet 2020
The Court is therefore satisfied that the applicants have been afforded adequate redress and can no longer claim to be victims of a violation of their rights under Article 3 of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0208JUD001086219
8 février 2024
remedies for the complaint about the inadequate conditions of his detention, as the action in tort had become an effective remedy for grievances similar to those raised by the applicant, allowing him to have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0507DEC000816722
7 mai 2025
dealing with the same legal and factual issues had previously been brought by the applicants and had already become the subject of the examination by the Court, can be considered abusive and should have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005
3 avril 2012
The parties have not provided any information about this part of the inquiry.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1022JUD001559014
22 octobre 2015
If the applicant had been granted temporary asylum, his extradition would have been suspended or even rescinded.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0416JUD001413407
16 avril 2015
been so small that it would not have justified the investment of a considerable sum. 21.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-226117
29 juin 2023
Final decision: Supreme Court of the Chuvashia Republic, 25/03/2021 33783/21* 03/06/2021 Aleksandra Yevgenyevna IVANOVA 2002 Aleksey Vladimirovich Glukhov Novocheboksarsk Manifestation in support
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0525DEC005118899
25 mai 2000
Natural and legal persons shall have the right to set up teaching institutions in a manner consistent with constitutional principles. ... 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0717JUD004211114
17 juillet 2025
In particular, they argued that he could have lodged a claim for damages within the enforcement proceedings pursuant to Article 112 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. 13.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1105JUD003558908
5 novembre 2015
Test shots have been done in respect of the KS-23 and KS23M carbines that were submitted for the examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD002735905
2 octobre 2012
Following his admission to the correctional colony the applicant claimed not to have been given a full set of prison clothing.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1113DEC002432405
13 novembre 2014
(d) Where enforcement of a judgment is prevented by the actions (or inaction) of the bailiffs, compensation will have to be recovered, but should be limited to the amount that would have
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0512DEC002900307
12 mai 2015
He is persuaded that the money was not intended to be paid to savers, nor would they have ever seen it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0502JUD001503705
2 mai 2013
Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of: Elisabeth Steiner, President, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Ksenija Turković, judges,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0710DEC005355608
10 juillet 2012
New court judgments have been delivered and enforced in respect of the above individuals.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1012DEC005510622
12 octobre 2023
constitutional appeal in this particular case in view of the length of the proceedings before the Constitutional Court 03/07/2023 10/07/2023 1,000 250 55123/22 21/11/2022 Hana
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0612JUD002944805
12 juin 2012
It notes that the Government have also accepted that that this period of the applicant’s detention did not comply with domestic law, and considers that it was not “lawful” within the meaning of Article