AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1011DEC001666890
11 octobre 1990
11 octobre 1990
Finally, the applicant complains that due to the fact that the samples were destroyed he was not allowed to have witnesses from the medical research laboratories examined on his behalf regarding the outcome
Source officiellePRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2762715-3025421
11 juin 2009
11 juin 2009
Its business consists of receiving, transmitting and executing orders for third parties and trading on its own behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0316DEC000209111
16 mars 2017
16 mars 2017
In the present case, the Court considers that apart from explicitly expressing her wish to do so, the applicant’s mother has a sufficient legitimate interest in pursuing the proceedings on behalf of her
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0910DEC002516618
10 septembre 2019
10 septembre 2019
It is essential for representatives to demonstrate that they have received specific and explicit instructions from the alleged victim, within the meaning of Article 34, on whose behalf they purport to
Source officiellePRESS;FORTHCOMINGJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2637513-2874055
13 février 2009
13 février 2009
The closed material was not disclosed to the detainee or his lawyers but was disclosed to a “special advocate”, appointed on behalf of each detainee by the Solicitor General.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-140217
18 décembre 2013
18 décembre 2013
On 2 December 2010 the Ministry of Justice of Georgia, acting as the central authority responsible for the obligations established by the Hague Convention, instituted proceedings on behalf of the applicant
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1970:1118JUD000283266
18 novembre 1970
18 novembre 1970
It cannot be represented, even partially, by the applicant’s lawyer, who acts on the applicant’s behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1110DEC004706115
10 novembre 2022
10 novembre 2022
For the Court’s assessment of the person’s standing to maintain the application on behalf of a deceased, what is important is not whether the rights at issue are transferable to the heirs but whether the
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1009JUD003245705
9 octobre 2008
9 octobre 2008
His spouse, Mrs Katica Gashi, expressed the wish to proceed with the application both on her own behalf and on behalf of her minor son, Edon Gashi. 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0905DEC003746804
5 septembre 2006
5 septembre 2006
On 24 October 1998 the third applicant was born and an application for asylum was also made on his behalf. On 3 August 1999 the applicants were granted temporary residence permits until 3 July 2000.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0624DEC002511221
24 juin 2025
24 juin 2025
Georgiev, the same lawyer who is acting on behalf of the applicant company before the Court. 6. On 2 August 2021 the Supreme Court of Cassation granted the request for reopening. 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-1633
31 mars 2009
31 mars 2009
The first applicant requested maternity benefit in his own name and on behalf of his children.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4507
15 janvier 2004
15 janvier 2004
eyewitnesses to the alleged incidents or to the remand in custody of the applicant’s husband, it could not be concluded beyond reasonable doubt that he had been abducted and killed by persons acting on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3450
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In 1994 the applicants allowed some members of the association to travel overseas on the association’s behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-5861
30 novembre 2000
30 novembre 2000
obligations Request for additional financial assistance: Article 6 inapplicable The first two applicants were the parents of the third applicant, a minor who had been disabled since birth, on whose behalf
Source officiellePRESS;HEARINGS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-68183-68651
31 mai 2001
31 mai 2001
fair trial) of the European Convention on Human Rights were violated in that he could not cross-examine the witnesses whose statements served as the basis for his conviction or have witnesses on his behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-4392
18 mai 2004
18 mai 2004
Four witnesses present at the scene, who were called by the applicant, gave evidence on his behalf to the court of first instance.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0110DEC001133906
10 janvier 2012
10 janvier 2012
By letter of 28 July 2011, Mr Florin Frăţeanu informed the Court that he wished to withdraw the application on behalf of the applicant company, adding that he had not been aware of the fact that the company
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0307DEC002840511
7 mars 2017
7 mars 2017
The Government’s submissions were transmitted to the representative, who was invited to submit, on behalf of her clients and as appropriate, comments on the unilateral declaration and observations
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-168271
3 octobre 2016
3 octobre 2016
23380/09, § 55, ECHR 2015) and having regard to the submissions made on behalf of the first applicant, Mr Osman İşçi (see, in particular, paragraphs 20 and 21 of the application form
Source officiellePage 61 sur 527