As regards the applicants listed in Appendix II, the Court notes that they have died and that no heirs have come forward.

Yasin Ateş died on 19   May 2001. His son continued the application in his deceased father’s name.

The report concluded that there was no causal link between E.B.’s death and the injuries found on his body and that E.B. had died of acute heart failure. 8.

On 13/11/2008 S. died. The applicant obtained victim status in the criminal proceedings.

People have even died of hunger in our village.

The autopsy report found that Mr Taïs had died of a haemorrhage following a rupture to the spleen.

    His wife died on 3 April 2001. His claim for widows’ benefits was made in June 2001.

She is the mother of Nikolay Ivanovich Tarariyev, a Russian national who was born in 1976 and died on 4 September 2002.

He died on 28 March 2002. The applicant was represented before the Court by Mr I. Barbalics, a lawyer practising in Nagyatád, Hungary.

They had attacked the victim and beat him, as a result of which he died. When O.U. had left the shop and saw his friend on the ground, he approached the applicant and M.K. for clarification.

On 8 March 1999 his wife died. She had worked full time until the birth of her son in 1968 and had made full social security contributions.

According to the death certificate submitted by the Government and uncontested by Vasila and Petre Constantin, the applicant died on 31   December   1996.

    The applicant was born in 1954 and died on 27 May 2014. On 24   October 2014 his wife, Mrs Schwab, was established as his heir. 6.

Beria, informed the Court that the applicant had died on 3   September 2008 and expressed the wish to pursue the case before the Court. 3.

Further, if T.P. had not participated in the march, it could not be excluded that he would still have died because of the unrecognised, hyperacute bacterial infection.

    The applicant complained of the ineffective investigation into the death of her husband, who died in a road traffic accident.

He died on 20 December 2006, in the course of the proceedings before the Court.

Mr Karel Vogrinčič died on 20   November 2007, in the course of the proceedings before the Court.

    On 31 March 2008 the applicant informed the first–instance court that B.C. had died before the action had been lodged. 13.

The applicant’s wife died on 12 August 1998 at the age of 62. At the time of her death, she had been in receipt of a retirement pension for over two years.