CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 663 résultats pour « Hiesse Rendu »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

In this connection, he also relied on his poor health, specifically his type-two diabetes, his high blood pressure, the loss of sight in his right eye and poor vision in his left, the amputation of both

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0127JUD001840591

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2009

27 janvier 2009

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1016JUD003805597

Admin. suprême

16 octobre 2001

16 octobre 2001

appeared on his behalf. 30.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0906DEC006351200

Admin. suprême

6 septembre 2005

6 septembre 2005

    Everyone has the right to respect for ... his home ... 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0702JUD006529014

Admin. suprême

2 juillet 2019

2 juillet 2019

He lodged his application with the Court following the dismissal of his administrative action by the Kúria .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0128JUD002758207

Admin. suprême

28 janvier 2020

28 janvier 2020

    The applicant reiterated his complaints. 43.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1204REP002488894

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 1998

4 décembre 1998

There was evidence of his struggle to make restitution and of his own sense of responsibility for his actions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0921JUD001235086

Admin. suprême

21 septembre 1993

21 septembre 1993

Following his arrest, the applicant was detained in a psychiatric hospital in Vienna in view of his mental condition and the risk of his committing suicide.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0218JUD000609106

Admin. suprême

18 février 2016

18 février 2016

been a breach of his right to be presumed innocent and his right to an independent and impartial tribunal. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0113JUD003704804

Admin. suprême

13 janvier 2009

13 janvier 2009

The summons could not be served on the applicant at his home address, as his parents stated that his whereabouts had been unknown for the past eight months. 12.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1007JUD004872512

Admin. suprême

7 octobre 2025

7 octobre 2025

His motive for hiding it in that “safe place” had been his fear that it might otherwise be stolen by thieves during his journey.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0513JUD002523003

Admin. suprême

13 mai 2008

13 mai 2008

He also broke the applicant’s teeth with his fist when the applicant refused to open his mouth. 18.     His inmates urinated on his food and forced him to eat it. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0410JUD007754614

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2018

10 avril 2018

hinder his contact with his mother.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1018JUD001811402

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2006

18 octobre 2006

One of the applicant’s lawyers requested that his client be released on the ground that the drugs in his possession had been intended for his personal use.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0121DEC006059000

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2003

21 janvier 2003

Consequently his evidence was not tainted in that regard.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12438

Admin. suprême

9 avril 2019

9 avril 2019

It therefore followed that, in principle, oral communication and correspondence between a lawyer and his or her client was privileged under Article 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD002249108

Admin. suprême

2 octobre 2012

2 octobre 2012

his actual taking into custody and not from the date on which the record of his arrest was drawn up.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1110JUD001924610

Admin. suprême

10 novembre 2011

10 novembre 2011

his extradition while his application for refugee status was pending.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1010DEC002152293

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 1994

10 octobre 1994

It further found that the applicant was not entitled to compensation, since his detention on remand was due to his gross negligence.   B.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0526JUD001696990

Admin. suprême

26 mai 1994

26 mai 1994

   Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Source officielle

Page 61 sur 334

← PrécédentSuivant →