The applicant complains, relying on Article 14 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 12, about alleged discrimination against him on account of his disability.

implicate him.

After Sh.A.’s death, the applicant had allegedly reiterated his demands to transfer part of the share to him. 6.

On numerous occasions during his trial the applicant sought the annulment of this measure before the domestic courts, complaining that the unreasonably long travel ban prevented him from conducting his

Mr   VK testified that the applicant offered him to discontinue the proceedings against his son, in exchange of a bribe.

His attendance at the hearing was necessary, not only to enable him to present his own case, but also to allow the judge to form a personal opinion about his mental capacity.

On 28 September 2010 the Wrocław District Court partly allowed his action and awarded him 5,000 Polish zlotys (PLN) in compensation.

Since then, he has lived with his sister J. and her family and, collectively, his four sisters look after him full-time. 6 .

identification number, phone number and the surface area of his apartment) and had used it for the purpose of sending him invoices, although he had neither signed a contract with the said supplier, nor

In particular, the revocation of the arrest order against him and the quashing of the decision declaring him a wanted person had taken place a few days after he had submitted the request to renounce his

Following his arrival they took him to an office and handcuffed him to a chair.

According to the applicant, the mother alienated the child from him and the authorities were not sufficiently active to help him restore his relationship with his child, even though he made several requests

The applicant contended that the police had filmed the search, had refused his request for the presence of a lawyer during the search, and had not allowed him to make a phone call.

  Before that, his salary had been blocked in order to force him to return home, where he would risk persecution by the secret service or the political police.

He was not reunited with his son until April 2003, when the boy’s nanny brought him to Ukraine.

of S.B. and not about his own actions, so it must have been clear to him that his testimony could not have incriminated him.

In particular, he alleges that several policemen beat him on the heels with a truncheon, hit him on the head through a pillow and punched him with boxing gloves.

On seeing his lawyer, he immediately retracted his confession, claiming that it had been obtained from him under duress.

On 31 January 2015 the police issued a penalty notice finding the applicant guilty of the minor offence of not reporting his new address of residence, fining him 500 Croatian kunas (HRK; approximately