CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC004740299
28 juin 2001
On 3 June 1992 it refused a request that the shares in the property be unequal. On 28 May 1993 the court declined the applicant’s petition to challenge a judge.
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-52281
24 avril 2003
1997; Whereas at the 633rd meeting of the Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission’s proposals, held by a decision adopted on 11 June 1998, in accordance with former Article
CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-56261
22 juillet 2003
s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Resolution ResDH(2003)125 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 June
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7282
13 novembre 2012
On 13   June 1990 the police and gendarmerie intervened and arrested numerous demonstrators; in consequence, the demonstrations increased.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-164430
31 mai 2016
On 16 June 2008 the applicant was presented with a dismissal order effective as of 10 June 2008.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC000791313
2 juin 2015
PROCEDURE On 6 June 2014 the Court invited the Government to submit observations on the admissibility and merits of the applicant’s complaint.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0525DEC001409306
25 mai 2010
On 8 June 2001 an action was brought with a view to evicting the applicant from her service flat.
ECLI:CEDH:001-138463
21 octobre 2013
On 2 June 2010 the District Prosecutor’s Office cancelled its own decision of 17 May 2010.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323DEC002862009
23 mars 2010
    Events after the introduction of the application The applicant’s representative introduced the present case to the Court by fax of 1 June 2009, which fax also contained a request to the Court
ECLI:CEDH:001-55548
17 septembre 1992
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Obermeier case delivered on 28 June
ECLI:CEDH:001-175328
15 juin 2017
On 4 June 2012 the Opole Regional Court rejected his appeal for failure to submit a copy of his appeal within the prescribed time-limit. On 14 June 2012 the applicant appealed.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003859704
5 avril 2011
Russia , no. 44543/04, 14 June 2007; and Kulkov and Others , no. 25114/03 et al . , 8   January 2009).
ECLI:CEDH:001-110115
10 février 2012
On 6 June 2004 the investigator questioned the applicant as a suspect, again in the absence of legal counsel.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116DEC001853206
16 janvier 2007
On 16 June 2003 the applicant and 14 other co-accused were indicted before the Gdańsk Regional Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003148096
22 mars 2001
1992, 9 June 1992, 8   October 1992, 10 November 1992, 9 March 1993, 14 July 1993, 12   October 1993, 18 November 1993, 11 February 1994, 17 March 1994, 21 June 1994, 18 October 1994, 6 December
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622DEC003200696
22 juin 2000
    By a decision of 28 June 1985, the Milan Magistrate postponed the said deadline to 18 December 1985.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC004378698
10 septembre 2002
It held hearings on 9 July 1991, as well as on 17 February, 15 April and 2   June 1992.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC003602002
22 mars 2011
On 8 June 1999 the Khabarovsk Garrison Military Court (“the Khabarovsk Court”) ruled in the applicant’s favour.
ECLI:CEDH:001-123822
8 juillet 2013
On 13 June 2001 the applicant received summons to the Totskiy Garrison Military Prosecutor’s office with an offer to cover her travel expenses.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0426JUD001239386
26 avril 1990
  On 16 December 1976 a judgment of the Indictment Division (chambre d'accusation) of the Toulouse Court of Appeal upholding a discharge order issued by the investigating judge on 3 June 1975 had
Page 61 sur 2732
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.