CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

54 628 résultats pour « Junker »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0628DEC004740299

Admin. suprême

28 juin 2001

28 juin 2001

On 3 June 1992 it refused a request that the shares in the property be unequal. On 28 May 1993 the court declined the applicant’s petition to challenge a judge.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;MERITS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-52281

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2003

24 avril 2003

1997; Whereas at the 633rd meeting of the Deputies, the Committee of Ministers, agreeing with the Commission’s proposals, held by a decision adopted on 11 June 1998, in accordance with former Article

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-56261

Admin. suprême

22 juillet 2003

22 juillet 2003

s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Resolution ResDH(2003)125 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 28 June

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-7282

Admin. suprême

13 novembre 2012

13 novembre 2012

On 13   June 1990 the police and gendarmerie intervened and arrested numerous demonstrators; in consequence, the demonstrations increased.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164430

Admin. suprême

31 mai 2016

31 mai 2016

On 16 June 2008 the applicant was presented with a dismissal order effective as of 10 June 2008.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0602DEC000791313

Admin. suprême

2 juin 2015

2 juin 2015

PROCEDURE On 6 June 2014 the Court invited the Government to submit observations on the admissibility and merits of the applicant’s complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0525DEC001409306

Admin. suprême

25 mai 2010

25 mai 2010

On 8 June 2001 an action was brought with a view to evicting the applicant from her service flat.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-138463

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2013

21 octobre 2013

On 2 June 2010 the District Prosecutor’s Office cancelled its own decision of 17 May 2010.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0323DEC002862009

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2010

23 mars 2010

    Events after the introduction of the application The applicant’s representative introduced the present case to the Court by fax of 1 June 2009, which fax also contained a request to the Court

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-55548

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 1992

17 septembre 1992

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),   Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Obermeier case delivered on 28 June

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-175328

Admin. suprême

15 juin 2017

15 juin 2017

On 4 June 2012 the Opole Regional Court rejected his appeal for failure to submit a copy of his appeal within the prescribed time-limit. On 14 June 2012 the applicant appealed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0405JUD003859704

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2011

5 avril 2011

Russia , no. 44543/04, 14 June 2007; and Kulkov and Others , no. 25114/03 et al . , 8   January 2009).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-110115

Admin. suprême

10 février 2012

10 février 2012

On 6 June 2004 the investigator questioned the applicant as a suspect, again in the absence of legal counsel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0116DEC001853206

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 2007

16 janvier 2007

On 16 June 2003 the applicant and 14 other co-accused were indicted before the Gdańsk Regional Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0322DEC003148096

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2001

22 mars 2001

1992, 9 June 1992, 8   October 1992, 10 November 1992, 9 March 1993, 14 July 1993, 12   October 1993, 18 November 1993, 11 February 1994, 17 March 1994, 21 June 1994, 18 October 1994, 6 December

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622DEC003200696

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2000

22 juin 2000

    By a decision of 28 June 1985, the Milan Magistrate postponed the said deadline to 18 December 1985.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0910DEC004378698

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 2002

10 septembre 2002

It held hearings on 9 July 1991, as well as on 17 February, 15 April and 2   June 1992.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0322DEC003602002

Admin. suprême

22 mars 2011

22 mars 2011

On 8 June 1999 the Khabarovsk Garrison Military Court (“the Khabarovsk Court”) ruled in the applicant’s favour.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123822

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2013

8 juillet 2013

On 13 June 2001 the applicant received summons to the Totskiy Garrison Military Prosecutor’s office with an offer to cover her travel expenses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0426JUD001239386

Admin. suprême

26 avril 1990

26 avril 1990

  On 16 December 1976 a judgment of the Indictment Division (chambre d'accusation) of the Toulouse Court of Appeal upholding a discharge order issued by the investigating judge on 3 June 1975 had

Source officielle

Page 61 sur 2732

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.