CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

16 369 résultats pour « Marc CASSIEDE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0514DEC005834708

Admin. suprême

14 mai 2013

14 mai 2013

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

Page 61 sur 819

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0619DEC005257715

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2018

19 juin 2018

The circumstances of the case 3.     The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows. 1.     Background to the case 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0705DEC006702101

Admin. suprême

5 juillet 2007

5 juillet 2007

Baia Mare, which had become S.C. Transgold S.A. Baia Mare, had caused excessive and dangerous pollution in the city of Baia Mare.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0202JUD003451504

Admin. suprême

2 février 2017

2 février 2017

In the case of Kulik v.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1012DEC002899903

Admin. suprême

12 octobre 2010

12 octobre 2010

    On 15 March 2004 the Satu Mare District Court acquitted the journalist and dismissed the applicant's claim for damages.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1987:1207DEC001166985

Admin. suprême

7 décembre 1987

7 décembre 1987

  However, according to the indictment, the applicant had based his opinion which he delivered in 1979 on experiments which may never have been carried out or, at least, were not carried out in the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1107DEC001151418

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2023

7 novembre 2023

Croatia (dec.), no. 54388/09, §   56, 5 March 2013).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-120384

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2013

6 mai 2013

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0305DEC004453018

Admin. suprême

5 mars 2024

5 mars 2024

    On 1   March 2018 the Constitutional Court ruled against the applicant. 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0208DEC001462721

Admin. suprême

8 février 2022

8 février 2022

    In the present case several investigations concerning the accident were carried out.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-192535

Admin. suprême

19 mars 2019

19 mars 2019

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-161916

Admin. suprême

16 mars 2016

16 mars 2016

The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-157496

Admin. suprême

2 septembre 2015

2 septembre 2015

At 6.30 pm remand prison officers took the handcuffs off Mr Samulevich as it appeared that he had calmed down.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2041305-2164973

Admin. suprême

21 juin 2007

21 juin 2007

She was discharged on 15 March 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0318DEC006210100

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2008

18 mars 2008

On 23   March   1995 the Self-Government Board of Appeal in Olsztyn ( Samorządowe Kolegium Odwoławcze ) quashed this decision and remitted the case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0530DEC004248013

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2023

30 mai 2023

    Following the remittal of the case in accordance with the rules on territorial jurisdiction, on 7 March 2012 the Shaki Administrative-Economic Court decided that the applicant’s claim against

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0515DEC003724303

Admin. suprême

15 mai 2012

15 mai 2012

    On 12 March 2002, the investigation was completed and the applicant was allowed access to the case file.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1989:0707JUD001403888

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 1989

7 juillet 1989

- it has never been carried out in such cases.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0125DEC002655305

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2011

25 janvier 2011

    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows. 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1112JUD005116407

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2015

12 novembre 2015

    On 11 March 2011 the application was communicated to the Government. THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 5.

Source officielle