The applicant is still in pre-trial detention on the basis of the risk of reoffending.

The trial court relied on statements B. had made at his own trial which were read out at the applicant’s trial and rejected an application for B. to be cross examined.

It appears that the applicant is still detained pending trial.

        In connection with the venue of the applicant's trial for robbery, the applicant suggests that his trial was unfair because the trial was held in Leicester, where

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

The applicant was taken in pre-trial detention.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based.

    After committal for trial in January 1991, the first pre-trial hearing was held in the Crown Court on 3 March 1991.

Article 342 The scope of the procedure before a pre-trial judge “The scope of the procedure before a pre-trial judge consists in reviewing, after a case has been sent for trial, a court’s competence and

already in pre ‑ trial detention, such detention had priority over serving the prison sentence.

The trial judge acknowledged that in principle it would seem wrong to pursue a criminal trial in the absence of the defendant or his legal representatives, but in the exercise of his discretion he decided

The trial judge endorsed the prosecutor’s position. 15.     On 13 June 2017 Mr Arzamasov’s mother asked the trial judge in writing for permission to see her son.

and after the offence record had been compiled,   Art. 6 (1) - and Art. 6 (3) (d) - unfair trial in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial

during the pre-trial investigation. 36.

    The applicant complained that the Riga Regional Court had held a hearing in his absence on 23   January 2002, thereby depriving him of his right to a fair trial.

    Pre-trial investigation 7.

    On 18 November 2016 the case was submitted for trial before the Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic.

pre-trial investigation” to detention “pending trial”.

A closed hearing is also possible, on a reasoned ruling of a court or order of a judge, in trials of persons younger than 16, in trials of sex crimes, or in other trials in order to preserve the confidentiality