On 18/03/2020 the justice of the peace found K. guilty as charged and released him from serving a sentence which became time barred.

    On 22 February 2014   the Zagreb Minor Offences Court found the applicant guilty of unlawfully entering a stadium during a football match on   21 February 2014, contrary to the

    On 22 April 2021 a court, consisting of B.P. as presiding judge and two other judges, accepted the guilty plea of F.D.R.

[Y] [L], Mme [V], la société Immontagne, Mme [X] [W] et la Selarl Guilleux et [T] [H] Notaires Associés.

The trial court approved the agreement, found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to the payment of a fine. The decision could not be appealed.

Thirteen months later the applicant and three co-defendants were arraigned and pleaded “not guilty”. The trial was fixed for late November.

COMPLAINTS The applicant complains under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention that he was declared “guilty” of a criminal offence by a non-judicial authority and that the civil court also referred to him

Criminal proceedings On 6 November 2014 the Court of Magistrates as a court of criminal judicature, and on appeal on 18 February 2016 the Criminal Court of Appeal, confirmed the applicant’s guilt for,

On 20 November 2012 the Chernihiv Regional Court of Appeal by its final judgment found the applicant guilty of an infringement of custom regulations.

  The applicant pleaded guilty to two charges of attempted murder and on 27 July 1988 was sentenced to two terms of imprisonment of eight years to run concurrently.

In a judgment of 2 November 2001 the District Court found the applicant not guilty of abuse of office and fraud and dismissed the case. On 5 November 2001 the prosecutor appealed.

le 1er juin 2023 par le Juge des contentieux de la protection de PONTOISE N° RG : 11-23-0223 Expéditions exécutoires Copies certifiées conformes délivrées le : 07.01.25 à : Me Victoire GUILLUY

It also found the applicant guilty of a new offence which carried a less severe punishment, sentenced him to a one-year suspended sentence and confirmed the lower courts’ judgments in part in allowing

On 21 July 2006 the Sabail District Court found the first applicant guilty and gave him a six-month suspended prison sentence.

In a judgment of 6 May 2011 the court convicted the applicants, basing its ruling on the jury’s guilty verdict.

  Some are more      consistent with guilt than others.   Not one of them, however, in      itself, proves guilt to the standard of proof required.

This does not mean that the court can conclude   simply because the accused does not give evidence that   he is guilty.

Vu la procédure suivante : Par une requête, enregistrée le 24 mars 2023, Mme A B, représentée par Me Guillou, demande au juge des référés : 1°) d'ordonner, sur le fondement des dispositions de l'article