Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 30 March 2026   FIRST SECTION Application no. 22576/25 Franc RATAJ against Croatia lodged on 16 July 2025 communicated on 10 March 2026 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The issue in the present case, therefore, was the State’s obligation, through the school authorities, to assume responsibility for the pupils entrusted to it.

} Published on 5 February 2024   SECOND SECTION Application no. 25182/22 Dragutin NOVOSEL and Others against Croatia lodged on 13 May 2022 communicated on 17 January 2024 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties.

The mere fact that their homes were rebuilt with some help from the authorities did not deprive them of their victim status (objection dismissed).

The applicant had also complained that he had been unable to examine or have examined Mr J.M.R., who was the principal witness in the case.

Portée et conséquences de la cassation 21.

Portée et conséquences de la cassation 21.

    On the facts, the Court observes that the mere fact that the authorities complied with the first judgment after a substantial delay cannot be viewed in this case as automatically depriving

Since the “possessions” were mere contractual rights to the exclusive use of the domain names and the contracts expressly stated that the domain holder was responsible for verifying whether third-party

The mere fact that payment is staggered and that the age of those concerned has been adopted as a criterion cannot in itself constitute a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

margin-top:12pt; margin-bottom:0pt; text-align:center } .s7ED160F0 { text-decoration:none } .s3DC36BA9 { font-family:Arial; text-decoration:underline; color:#0069d6 } Information Note on the Court’s case-law

The mere act of bringing foreign currency in cash into Russia was not illegal under Russian law; rather, it only needed to be declared to the customs authorities.

LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIÈRE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le moyen unique : Vu l'article L. 611-1, alinéas 2 et 3, du code de l'entrée et du séjour des étrangers et du droit d'asile

The present case concerns the applicant’s arrest and pre-trial detention in the framework of administrative offence proceedings conducted against him.

Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 7 April 2025   SECOND SECTION Application no. 28005/24 S.B. against Germany lodged on 27 September 2024 communicated on 20 March 2025 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE