Having deliberated in private on 26 October 1999, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1.

    The applicant further complains under Article 8 that the State has interfered in his private life to the extent that he is prohibited from establishing a new family. 4.

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 1 July 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Elens-Passos , Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 7 October 2003, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

DECISION Application no. 34964/03 by Paweł KOWALSKI against Poland The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 23   January 2007 as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas

O’Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 25 May 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar, Having regard to the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the application by a Committee, Having deliberated in private

Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza , President ,   Mr   J. Makarczyk ,   Mrs   V.

Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Lech Garlicki,   Ljiljana Mijović,   David Thór Björgvinsson

O'Boyle , Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 30 March 2004, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1.

Finland, The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Sir   Nicolas Bratza , President ,   Mr   J. Casadevall ,   Mr   M.

    Everyone has the right to respect for his private and family life, his home and his correspondence. 2.

Moldova , The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nicolas Bratza, President,   Lech Garlicki,   Giovanni Bonello,   Ljiljana Mijović

    The Court reiterates that detention, like any other measure depriving a person of his liberty, entails inherent limitations on private and family life.

In this connection, there are different ways of ensuring “respect for private life”, and the nature of the State's obligation will depend on the particular aspect of private life that is at issue (see

Nicolas BRATZA, QC       Counsel Mr.

Ces circonstances ne privent toutefois pas l'avis d'inaptitude de son effet, même s'il survient alors que la salariée avait des projets.

Nicole, - la société " LA CADEAUTIERE "- contre un arrêt du 30 septembre 1985 de la cour d'appel d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE (5ème chambre) qui a condamné la première à 5 000 francs d'amende ainsi qu'à des réparations

DÉBATS : à l'audience tenue le 20 Mars 2025, ont été entendus : - Mme Nicole COCHET, en son rapport ; - M.