CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0412DEC002979802
12 avril 2007
On the same date, the Šiauliai City District Court extended the term of the applicant’s detention until 12 May 1999 on the same grounds, the applicant’s lawyer being present.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0210JUD001198202
10 février 2009
Molochkov had never been detained in the same cell of the same prison in the Samara Region together with the applicant.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD000834913
12 janvier 2016
It thus lasted sixteen years and eigth months for four levels of jurisdiction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0111DEC002928195
11 janvier 2000
The investigation, during which all the accused were questioned, lasted 5 years.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1022DEC002774195
22 octobre 1997
  The applicant continued in respect of his case:   <Translation>        "The proceedings have meanwhile lasted more than ten years.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1211JUD003284806
11 décembre 2008
Thus, the criminal proceedings lasted almost ten years. B.     Reasonableness of the length of the proceedings 30.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1031JUD001301702
31 octobre 2006
It has therefore already lasted more than thirteen years in total. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0615JUD004435302
15 juin 2006
    The proceedings therefore lasted for more than twenty years of which five years one month and thirteen days fall to be examined by the Court. 38.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1013JUD004981714
13 octobre 2020
    In respect of the first and the second applicants, the proceedings lasted from 2001 until 2011 and ended with their acquittal following two levels of jurisdiction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0326JUD007295013
26 mars 2020
The trial and appellate proceedings lasted for thirteen years before various courts, including on three occasions before the Supreme Court.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0702JUD004403407
2 juillet 2009
It was also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article   29   §   3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1706492-1797178
22 juin 2006
  The Court noted that the proceedings in question had lasted ten years and ten months.
ECLI:CEDH:003-1532246-1613763
15 décembre 2005
  The Court noted that the proceedings in question had lasted ten years and four months.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0503DEC003618697
3 mai 2001
Thus, pursuant to Section 287/B of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it had to reject any further petition for review brought by the same person.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD002664912
23 février 2016
The court relied on the same grounds as previously.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1972:0622JUD000261465
22 juin 1972
At the same time they sent to the Court two further letters from the applicant. 7.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1009JUD004151305
9 octobre 2007
Consequently, they have lasted more than six years and three months before two instances. 36.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0715JUD004207898
15 juillet 2003
On the same date it discontinued them. 2.     Criminal proceedings 41.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309JUD006022500
9 mars 2004
On the same day she complained to the Minister of Justice about their excessive length. 19.     The proceedings were resumed on 30 September 1997.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0810JUD005679300
10 août 2006
Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. 5.
Page 62 sur 348