Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125DEC007937617
25 novembre 2021
25 novembre 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-248725
19 janvier 2026
19 janvier 2026
Do the applicants have standing to complain about Mr Tatunashvili’s detention (see, for the general principles, Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-225803
12 juin 2023
12 juin 2023
(iii) Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention (see
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-2513
6 septembre 2007
6 septembre 2007
When the hospital failed to respond positively to their complaint, the applicants applied to the court of first instance and, acting on behalf of their child, claimed non‑pecuniary damage for an alleged
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0408DEC003683414
8 avril 2021
8 avril 2021
The observations were forwarded to the applicants’ representatives, who were invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicants. No observations were submitted.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-207909
15 janvier 2021
15 janvier 2021
Did the applicant A.P. have standing to act on behalf of the minor applicant A.M. (see Eberhard and M. v. Slovenia , nos. 8673/05 and 9733/05, 1 December 2009, § 90)? 2.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-224906
24 avril 2023
24 avril 2023
Ukraine lodged on 26 May 2014 communicated on 24 April 2023 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the judicial proceedings initiated by the Deputy Prosecutor of the Chernivtsi Region on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11337
6 décembre 2016
6 décembre 2016
In the instant case, the relatives pursuing the applications on behalf of the fourteen deceased applicants allege that the applicants were among some 170 people to have been killed by the security
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102DEC002135405
2 novembre 2010
2 novembre 2010
Mora Bajrami, on behalf of the “ Helsinki Committee for Human Rights of the Republic of Macedonia”. The Macedonian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs R.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622DEC005803712
22 juin 2023
22 juin 2023
Electronic Communications Service (eComms), the Government’s observations were forwarded to the applicants’ lawyer, and he was invited to submit by 3 November 2021 the written observations on behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-177245
29 août 2017
29 août 2017
Was the applicant able to obtain the attendance of witnesses on his behalf under the same conditions as witnesses against him, as required by Article 6 § 3 (d) of the Convention?
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0628DEC001381709
28 juin 2016
28 juin 2016
No heirs or close relatives have expressed the wish to pursue the application on his behalf.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-13016
29 octobre 2020
29 octobre 2020
After taking over the messaging application, Telegram Messenger Inc. maintained the complaints and expressed intention to pursue them following Telegram Messenger LLP’s dissolution on their behalf and
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0113DEC003540510
13 janvier 2015
13 janvier 2015
The observations were forwarded to the applicant’s representative, who was invited to submit written observations on behalf of the applicant. No reply was received to the Registry’s letter.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010DEC001832009
10 octobre 2017
10 octobre 2017
The Government’s observations on the admissibility and merits were forwarded to the applicants’ representative, who was invited to submit observations on behalf of the applicants.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-199538
29 novembre 2019
29 novembre 2019
The Constitutional Court considered that, in a situation where the authority form accompanying the constitutional complaint empowered an attorney office (legal person) to act on the applicant’s behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0613DEC004418616
13 juin 2024
13 juin 2024
Electronic Communications Service (eComms) inviting it to inform the Court whether the applicant party had been dissolved and if there were any legal successors willing to pursue the application on its behalf
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-10361
17 février 2015
17 février 2015
Although the applicant had lodged the application in her private capacity and not on behalf of the association she represented, the information she sought to obtain was directly related to her work in
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7132
26 septembre 2000
26 septembre 2000
Article 41 – No memorial on the merits was submitted on behalf of the applicants and no claim for just satisfaction was submitted until a late stage.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0616DEC004001208
16 juin 2011
16 juin 2011
deliberated, decides as follows: THE FACTS Application no. 40012/08 was lodged by Mr Clinton Allotey Kpapoe – the first applicant –, a Ghanaian national who was born in 1960 and lives in Amsterdam, also on behalf
Source officiellePage 63 sur 527