In so far as relevant, the decision of the Constitutional Court reads as follows: “The applicant’s allegations of a violation of Article 29 of the Constitution are unfounded.

    Relevant domestic law The relevant provisions of the Housing Act ( Zakon o stambenim odnosima , Official Gazette nos. 51/1985, 42/1986, 22/1992 and 70/1993) read as follows: Section 8 “A

He invokes Article 6 of the Convention, which reads insofar as relevant as follows: “1.

Article 5.1 of the Civil Code reads: “1.

He relied on Article 6 of the Convention, which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

Article 161 §§ 4, 5 and 7 reads as follows: “4.

It further held that the Court of Appeal had correctly applied the relevant principles, in particular the concept of “ordinary reader” and the importance of reputation. II.

The relevant part of the decision reads as follows: “It appears from the record drawn up on 7 March 2005 by the policeman on duty A.

The Central Office also obtained another in-house expert report, the relevant part of which reads as follows: “In the case at hand, [the applicant] had been unfit to work on 27 November 2009 because the

It reads as follows: “1.

    Article 2 § 2 of the Basic Law reads: “Every person shall have the right to life and physical integrity. Freedom of the person shall be inviolable.

That provision reads: “1.

    The Human Rights Watch World Report 2005 – Tajikistan, issued on 12 January 2005, reads as follows: “The human rights situation in Tajikistan is fragile.

THE LAW Article 37 of the Convention, as far as relevant, reads as follows: “1.

he preferred to issue an injunction requiring the applicant company to publish a statement at its own expense in the following issue of Paris-Match , under the heading “Court injunction”, informing readers

held on 4 November 2013 statements that B.C., N.J., O.K. and A.T. had given – without the presence of the applicant or his lawyer – at (i) the investigation stage and (ii) outside the main hearing were read

    On 3 December 2020 the Court received a declaration from the Government regarding a friendly settlement of the case, which reads as follows: “I hereby declare that the Government of Albania

    The Constitution of the Republic of Serbia 2006 (Ustav Republike Srbije; published in OG RS no. 98/06) The relevant provision of the Constitution reads as follows: Article 170 “A constitutional

THE LAW The applicant complained that the proceedings lasted an unreasonably long time, in breach of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention, which reads as follows: “In the determination of his civil rights and

; display:inline-block } .sF2E32F9B { width:36.61pt; display:inline-block } .s5F32E900 { width:208.31pt; display:inline-block }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application nos. 1163/08 and 1170/08 by Reza