Patrice B..., M. Augustin H..., M. Richard C...et M. Jean-Luc Y....

Elle demandait que soit jugées prescrites en application des dispositions de l'article L3245-1 du code du travail, toutes les sommes réclamées pour la période antérieure au 2 mai 2006.

Patrice XM..., domicilié ..., 60 / à Mme Myriam XN..., domiciliée ..., 61 / à Mme Angélique XO..., domiciliée ..., 62 / à M.

JUILLET 2025 ENTRE : DEMANDERESSE suivant assignation du 19 mai 2025 Madame [P] [W] née le [Date naissance 3] 1951 à [Localité 6] [Adresse 2] [Localité 4] représentée par Me Simon PANTEL

Patrice et René Z..., domiciliés en cette qualité audit siège, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 10 janvier 1996 par la cour d'appel de Paris (23ème chambre, section A), au profit de la société Nord France

The civil division has six judges sitting in two different panels. The president of the court sits on one of the panels.

Friedrich Wilhelm Pammel est retraité de la fonction publique et vit actuellement à Hanovre.   9.

Entre 1992 et 1996, il a subi de nombreuses rechutes prises en charge au titre de la maladie. Il a finalement été licencié le 3 juillet 1996.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

  The case has been struck out at the applicant’s request after an agreement was reached between the parties, following the publication of a decision by the Greek Minister of Finance dealing with

On 10 January 1997 the Vorarlberg Independent Administrative Panel filed its comments on the applicant’s appeal.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

Accordingly, in respect of the content of most articles, the Court reached the same conclusion as had the Constitutional Court.

In that event, a panel of five judges considers whether the case raises a serious question affecting the interpretation or application of the Convention or its protocols, or a serious issue of general

The applicant did not favour the compromise finally reached and reacted in consequence.

N° de minute : 26/00213 Formule Exécutoire délivrée le : 01-04-2026 à : Me Emmanuel SOURDON Copie Conforme délivrée le : 01-04-2026 à : Me Stanislas DE JORNA Me Juliette MEL Me Patrice

[V] [F] [Adresse 1] [Localité 3] Rep/assistant : Maître Jean patrice SELLY de la SELARL SELLY-MOLIERE AVOCATS ASSOCIES, avocats au barreau de SAINT-DENIS-DE-LA-REUNION Copie exécutoire délivrée le