CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD003775803

Admin. suprême

14 novembre 2008

14 novembre 2008

He argued that the enforcement of the second judgment had also lasted too long. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122JUD002844102

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2005

22 novembre 2005

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC004296198

Admin. suprême

12 mars 2002

12 mars 2002

In this connection, the only remedies to be exhausted are those which relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-173970

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2017

3 mai 2017

His hospitalisation lasted until 7 May 2008. 5.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0108REP001603890

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 1993

8 janvier 1993

Having regard to the co-operation between the two accused, who in the course of the proceedings had sometimes been assisted by the same counsel, proceedings could not be separated.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD002585106

Admin. suprême

20 décembre 2011

20 décembre 2011

Two expert examinations were ordered and lasted for about three months. THE LAW I.     SCOPE OF THE CASE 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000555506

Admin. suprême

18 décembre 2008

18 décembre 2008

It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2440853-2626977

Admin. suprême

31 juillet 2008

31 juillet 2008

That showed that Austria did not consider it essential for its policy in the field to apply the same ten-year qualifying period to all.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD000998403

Admin. suprême

14 octobre 2008

14 octobre 2008

It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC001899203

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2007

11 septembre 2007

On the same day, the applicant made statements to the police and the Gebze Magistrates’ Court .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1202DEC001388288

Admin. suprême

2 décembre 1991

2 décembre 1991

The competent courts had first to establish whether or not proceedings had lasted unreasonably long, and what consequences had to be drawn.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC003094496

Admin. suprême

18 janvier 2000

18 janvier 2000

      On 4 October 1984 an expert and a judge, Mrs Canan Karcı, from the same court, conducted a second survey of the land.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010JUD003094496

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2002

10 octobre 2002

    On 4 October 1984 an expert and a judge, Mrs Canan Karcı, from the same court, conducted a second survey of the land. 14.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0425JUD003276303

Admin. suprême

25 avril 2006

25 avril 2006

Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS 4.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2972213-3273381

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 2009

17 décembre 2009

reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights, he alleged that the proceedings brought against him for the purchase, sale and possession of drugs had been unfair in several respects and had lasted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-116773

Admin. suprême

21 janvier 2013

21 janvier 2013

On the same ground the border guards refused to allow the applicants to disembark. The border guards asked the lawyer to leave the vessel.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113192

Admin. suprême

29 août 2012

29 août 2012

On the same day the applicant was taken to the Medical Emergency Centre no.   1 of Kazan where he stayed until 2 July 2008 for medical care.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205148

Admin. suprême

18 septembre 2020

18 septembre 2020

This informal questioning lasted for almost three hours. On 28 January 2016 at 12.31 p.m. the applicant was brought before the Zamość District Prosecutor ( Prokurator Rejonowy ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-148779

Admin. suprême

19 novembre 2014

19 novembre 2014

According to the applicant, his interrogation lasted about thirty minutes during which he was questioned about his biography and family.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0405JUD003764510

Admin. suprême

5 avril 2012

5 avril 2012

    On 18 November 2009 the same court extended the maximum period of the applicant’s detention to four months (until 29 January 2010) on similar grounds. 9.

Source officielle

Page 64 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →