CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1114JUD003775803
14 novembre 2008
He argued that the enforcement of the second judgment had also lasted too long. 11.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1122JUD002844102
22 novembre 2005
Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0312DEC004296198
12 mars 2002
In this connection, the only remedies to be exhausted are those which relate to the breaches alleged and at the same time are available and sufficient.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-173970
3 mai 2017
His hospitalisation lasted until 7 May 2008. 5.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0108REP001603890
8 janvier 1993
Having regard to the co-operation between the two accused, who in the course of the proceedings had sometimes been assisted by the same counsel, proceedings could not be separated.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD002585106
20 décembre 2011
Two expert examinations were ordered and lasted for about three months. THE LAW I.     SCOPE OF THE CASE 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1218JUD000555506
18 décembre 2008
It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS I.     THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2440853-2626977
31 juillet 2008
That showed that Austria did not consider it essential for its policy in the field to apply the same ten-year qualifying period to all.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014JUD000998403
14 octobre 2008
It also decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time (Article 29 § 3). THE FACTS THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE 4.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911DEC001899203
11 septembre 2007
On the same day, the applicant made statements to the police and the Gebze Magistrates’ Court .
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1202DEC001388288
2 décembre 1991
The competent courts had first to establish whether or not proceedings had lasted unreasonably long, and what consequences had to be drawn.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0118DEC003094496
18 janvier 2000
      On 4 October 1984 an expert and a judge, Mrs Canan Karcı, from the same court, conducted a second survey of the land.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1010JUD003094496
10 octobre 2002
    On 4 October 1984 an expert and a judge, Mrs Canan Karcı, from the same court, conducted a second survey of the land. 14.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0425JUD003276303
25 avril 2006
Applying Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to rule on the admissibility and merits of the application at the same time. THE FACTS 4.
ECLI:CEDH:003-2972213-3273381
17 décembre 2009
reasonable time) of the European Convention on Human Rights, he alleged that the proceedings brought against him for the purchase, sale and possession of drugs had been unfair in several respects and had lasted
ECLI:CEDH:001-116773
21 janvier 2013
On the same ground the border guards refused to allow the applicants to disembark. The border guards asked the lawyer to leave the vessel.
ECLI:CEDH:001-113192
29 août 2012
On the same day the applicant was taken to the Medical Emergency Centre no.   1 of Kazan where he stayed until 2 July 2008 for medical care.
ECLI:CEDH:001-205148
18 septembre 2020
This informal questioning lasted for almost three hours. On 28 January 2016 at 12.31 p.m. the applicant was brought before the Zamość District Prosecutor ( Prokurator Rejonowy ).
ECLI:CEDH:001-148779
19 novembre 2014
According to the applicant, his interrogation lasted about thirty minutes during which he was questioned about his biography and family.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0405JUD003764510
5 avril 2012
    On 18 November 2009 the same court extended the maximum period of the applicant’s detention to four months (until 29 January 2010) on similar grounds. 9.
Page 64 sur 348