Fundamental Freedoms (hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the Campbell case delivered on 25 March

On 10 March 2008 the Beli Manastir Municipal Court dismissed the applicant’s civil action, upholding the reasons for his dismissal relied upon by the school.

In March 2018 the Burgas Administrative Court dismissed his claim (see реш.   № 564 от 23.03.2018 г. по адм. д. № 1786/2017 г., БАС ). Mr Simeonov appealed on points of law.

On 27 March 2002 both the applicant and his lawyer finished consulting the case-file. On 5 June 2002 the case was referred to the Court of Appeal.

Par acte de commissaire de justice délivré le 6 août 2021, M. et Mme [X] ainsi que la société Groupama Centre Manche ont assigné M.

, 20 and 22 April and 30 June 1992, by the Government on 27 March, 10 April and 15 June 1992 and by the Delegate of the Commission on 10 April 1992.

tenants, it could not enforce the judgment of 14 March 1997.

Une histoire qui marche toujours, puisque le couple s’est de nouveau affiché ensemble ce lundi sur les réseaux sociaux.

However, he had not submitted any evidence for the protection of the applicant’s rights, neither before nor after the decision of 17 March 2009, nor after the decision of 24 March 2009.

    Report by the Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights on his Special Mission to Armenia, 12-15 March 2008, CommDH(2008)11REV, 20 March 2008 39 .

convention, by a Swedish national, Mr Owe Skoogström, alleging among other things that he had neither been "brought promptly before a judge or other officer authorised by law to exercise judicial power" nor

Westerdiek , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 27 March 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and

THE LAW On 7 March 2008 the President of the Court gave notice of the application to the respondent Government under Rule 54 § 2 (c) of the Rules of Court.

In consequence, the trial was rescheduled for the next available dates, which were in March 1998, by which time the applicant had just turned 15.

It noted in particular that the decisive factor was that neither the applicant herself nor her husband were in a position to meet the family’s needs through their own resources without relying on government

  the United Kingdom , 25 March 1992, § 48 Series A no. 233)?   3.

font-weight:bold } .sA36B60A1 { font-family:Arial; font-style:italic } Published on 9 December 2024   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 27144/17 Sanda ŞLEPAC against the Republic of Moldova lodged on 28 March

  Bulgaria , no. 22457/08, §§ 96-100, 15   November 2011; and, mutatis mutandis , Selami and Others v. the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia , no. 78241/13, §§ 53-67, 1   March 2018)

The Court advised the Government thereof on 14   March 2017 and will continue processing the application under the case name of Romanov v. Russia .

He did not file such observations or a claim for just satisfaction on behalf of BNR within the time-limit fixed   for that purpose: 5 March 2024. Nor did he seek an extension of that time-limit.