AU NOM DU PEUPLE FRANCAIS LA COUR DE CASSATION, PREMIERE CHAMBRE CIVILE, a rendu l'arrêt suivant : Sur le pourvoi formé par la société Laboratoires Beecham, société anonyme, dont le siège est ...

B D et Bénédicte Ponde Belamie.

    A second suspension was introduced by Legislative Decree no. 708 of 29 October 1986, which became Law no. 899 of 23 December 1986 (“Law no. 899/86”).

l'appel de la BECM recevable et bien fondé ; DECLARER l'appel incident de la BECM recevable et bien fondé ; INFIRMER le jugement entrepris en tant qu'il a retenu que la BECM a engagé sa responsabilité

In such a situation, the six ‑ months period might be calculated from the time when the applicant becomes aware, or should have become aware, of these circumstances (see Veznedaroğlu v.

    STRASBOURG     18 April 2013     FINAL   18/07/2013   This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention.

The decision became final, as the parties did not appeal against it. 10.

The Court observes that the judgments of 11 December 2001 were quashed shortly after having become binding and enforceable.

On 27 May 2003 the Supreme Court of Ukraine upheld the above judgment and it became final.

    On 20 December 2011 the judgment of the first-instance court was upheld by the Court of Cassation and became final. COMPLAINTS 11.

The case was initiated in 1999 and became final on 24 January 2005. It was notified on 17 March 2006.

    On 24 June 2013 the Court of Cassation upheld the first applicant’s sentence and the judgment became final in respect of him.

The judgments became final but their enforcement was delayed by the authorities. 2.

Mandataire Judiciaire, ès qualités de liquidateur judiciaire de la Société Patrick X... représenté par Me Christian MOREL, avoué à la Cour SOCIETE BANQUE DE L'ECONOMIE DU COMMERCE ET DE LA MONETIQUE (BECM

The judgment was not appealed against and became final on 13   August   1999.

On 10 October 2002 the judgment of 12 September 2002 became final since neither the applicant nor the Sivas public prosecutor appealed.

the fact that the applicant only became aware of the decision later (see Keskin and Others v.

On 18 December 2003 the applicant became the owner of additional living premises, no. 1a, 3 and 19, in the communal flats at the same address.

Attendu, selon l'arrêt attaqué (Nancy, 25 janvier 2012), que le 23 octobre 1999, Mme X..., la société Pharmacie des prémontrés et la société Banque de l'économie, du commerce et de la monétique (la BECM

novembre 1990, deux gardes de la chasse et de la faune sauvage ont constaté que l'exploitant d'une pizzeria commercialisait un pâté en barquette fabriqué en Belgique et portant la mention " mousse de bécasse