CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005
3 avril 2012
    On 12 August 2002 the applicant submitted his complaint to the Pokachi Town Court and requested it to consider his complaint under the rules of civil procedure. 26.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0516JUD002039007
16 mai 2013
his or her documents.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0903REP002483594
3 septembre 1996
recall to prison on revocation of his licence.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC001571716
4 juin 2024
order relating to his sentence ( incidente di esecuzione ).
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002442694
16 janvier 1996
  On 9 January 1993, while the first applicant exercised his right of access to his children, his daughter E.T. hurt herself in the first applicant's apartment because a rocking horse fell apart.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0107JUD005452800
7 janvier 2003
It was claimed that his participation at this stage would render him a judge in his own cause and offend against the rule of impartiality. However, the objection was rejected. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD004900114
18 mars 2021
D.V., his wife and sister continued to live in the house, while his children moved out over time but continued to live in Croatia. 8.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-205028
9 septembre 2020
On 27 March 2007 the Committee reviewed his detention and authorised his release. He was released the following day. Domestic proceedings 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1015REP003024096
15 octobre 1996
The applicant further argues that the risk to his physical integrity from the removal constitutes a violation of his right to respect for his private life as guaranteed under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD002127203
2 novembre 2010
in respect of his original complaint.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-11051
23 février 2016
(ii)     Substantive aspect with regard to the first applicant – It was not necessary to examine every aspect of the treatment meted out to the applicant during his abduction, his transfer abroad
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1125DEC001014013
25 novembre 2014
He claimed to have agreed with the first and second applicants that they would take care of his children in his absence. 46.
ECLI:CEDH:001-127385
23 septembre 2013
his conviction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002339894
17 mai 1995
Moreover, his whereabouts were unknown since his release from detention on 30 March 1989. Thus, there was still a danger of his absconding.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001148785
25 octobre 1990
   In his application of 18 March 1985 to the Commission (no. 11487/85), Mr Koendjbiharie complained that his confinement had been extended on the basis of an application submitted after the
ECLI:CEDH:001-142484
20 mars 2014
A.R. stated that he had recognised him because of his hairstyle and the shape of his face. 9.     On 20 July 2004 the police initiated the investigation. 10.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796
27 septembre 1999
current relationship and whether his parents knew of his homosexuality.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD004997216
10 mars 2020
In support of his application, the applicant attached his curriculum vitae and a letter of recommendation from his place of work. 10 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD002955513
22 avril 2021
    According to the applicant, his conflict with R.V. and R.V.’s subsequent involvement in his final mathematics examination resulted in his poor overall performance.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000389119
18 février 2020
decompensation caused by his illness. 16 .
Page 65 sur 334