CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 663 résultats pour « Hiesse Rendu »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD001488005

Admin. suprême

3 avril 2012

3 avril 2012

    On 12 August 2002 the applicant submitted his complaint to the Pokachi Town Court and requested it to consider his complaint under the rules of civil procedure. 26.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0516JUD002039007

Admin. suprême

16 mai 2013

16 mai 2013

his or her documents.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0903REP002483594

Admin. suprême

3 septembre 1996

3 septembre 1996

recall to prison on revocation of his licence.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604DEC001571716

Admin. suprême

4 juin 2024

4 juin 2024

order relating to his sentence ( incidente di esecuzione ).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0116DEC002442694

Admin. suprême

16 janvier 1996

16 janvier 1996

  On 9 January 1993, while the first applicant exercised his right of access to his children, his daughter E.T. hurt herself in the first applicant's apartment because a rocking horse fell apart.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2003:0107JUD005452800

Admin. suprême

7 janvier 2003

7 janvier 2003

It was claimed that his participation at this stage would render him a judge in his own cause and offend against the rule of impartiality. However, the objection was rejected. 18.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0318JUD004900114

Admin. suprême

18 mars 2021

18 mars 2021

D.V., his wife and sister continued to live in the house, while his children moved out over time but continued to live in Croatia. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-205028

Admin. suprême

9 septembre 2020

9 septembre 2020

On 27 March 2007 the Committee reviewed his detention and authorised his release. He was released the following day. Domestic proceedings 3.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1015REP003024096

Admin. suprême

15 octobre 1996

15 octobre 1996

The applicant further argues that the risk to his physical integrity from the removal constitutes a violation of his right to respect for his private life as guaranteed under Article 8 (Art. 8) of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD002127203

Admin. suprême

2 novembre 2010

2 novembre 2010

in respect of his original complaint.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11051

Admin. suprême

23 février 2016

23 février 2016

(ii)     Substantive aspect with regard to the first applicant – It was not necessary to examine every aspect of the treatment meted out to the applicant during his abduction, his transfer abroad

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1125DEC001014013

Admin. suprême

25 novembre 2014

25 novembre 2014

He claimed to have agreed with the first and second applicants that they would take care of his children in his absence. 46.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127385

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2013

23 septembre 2013

his conviction.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0517DEC002339894

Admin. suprême

17 mai 1995

17 mai 1995

Moreover, his whereabouts were unknown since his release from detention on 30 March 1989. Thus, there was still a danger of his absconding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1025JUD001148785

Admin. suprême

25 octobre 1990

25 octobre 1990

   In his application of 18 March 1985 to the Commission (no. 11487/85), Mr Koendjbiharie complained that his confinement had been extended on the basis of an application submitted after the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-142484

Admin. suprême

20 mars 2014

20 mars 2014

A.R. stated that he had recognised him because of his hairstyle and the shape of his face. 9.     On 20 July 2004 the police initiated the investigation. 10.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003141796

Admin. suprême

27 septembre 1999

27 septembre 1999

current relationship and whether his parents knew of his homosexuality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0310JUD004997216

Admin. suprême

10 mars 2020

10 mars 2020

In support of his application, the applicant attached his curriculum vitae and a letter of recommendation from his place of work. 10 .

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0422JUD002955513

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2021

22 avril 2021

    According to the applicant, his conflict with R.V. and R.V.’s subsequent involvement in his final mathematics examination resulted in his poor overall performance.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000389119

Admin. suprême

18 février 2020

18 février 2020

decompensation caused by his illness. 16 .

Source officielle

Page 65 sur 334

← PrécédentSuivant →