It stated that that measure could not prevent the applicant from reoffending (as the offences he was accused of could be committed without leaving home) or obstructing the administration of justice.

Article 5 : L’Etat versera à Me Lelong une somme de 1 550 euros en application des dispositions du deuxième alinéa de l’article 37 de la loi du 10 juillet 1991, sous réserve que Me Lelong renonce à percevoir

[B] [I] à verser, au titre de l'article 700 du code de procédure civile, 1.000 euros à la société La Banque Postale Leasing & Factoring, * condamné M.

B..., représenté par Me Lelong, demande au tribunal : 1°) d’annuler l’avis des sommes à payer émis le 13 juin 2024 par le centre national de la fonction publique territoriale aux fins de recouvrement

On the same day the Gdansk Regional Prosecutor imposed on the applicant other preventive measures, namely police supervision and prohibition on leaving Poland combined with the withholding of his passport

BANQUE POSTALE LEASING & FACTORING [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] représentée par Me Maxime BOULET, avocat au barreau de LILLE JUGE DES RÉFÉRÉS : Samuel TILLIE, Premier Vice-Président adjoint, suppléant

Adresse 6] représentée par Me Catherine Camus-Demailly, avocat au barreau de Douai, avocat constitué assistée de Me Emilie Guillemant, avocat au barreau de Lille, avocat plaidant SAS CM-CIC Leasing

    In the leading cases of Ananyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 42525/07 and 60800/08, 10 January 2012, and Butko v.

    In the leading case of Iacov Stanciu v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading cases of Svetlana Naumenko v. Ukraine, no. 41984/98, 9 November 2004 and Efimenko v.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, nos.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 10.

    In the leading case of Merit v. Ukraine (no. 66561/01, 30 March 2004), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Yevdokimov and Others v. Russia, cited above, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Melnik v. Ukraine, (no. 72286/01, 28 March 2006), the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case. 9.

    In the leading case of Gerasimov and Others v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.

    In the leading case of Gankin and Others v.

    In the leading case of Sergey Babushkin v.