The proceedings resumed and several warrants were issued for the applicant’s arrest as,   since he had absconded, he did not respond to summonses issued by the court.

view to extradition (9 months): inadmissible On 14 September 2000, the applicant, who is of British nationality, was arrested in Italy and detained pending extradition under an international arrest warrant

The conversation had been intercepted on the basis of a warrant issued by the prosecutor pursuant to the provisions of Law No. 51/1991 on national security for a period between 13 August and 12 November

In particular, he denied that he had been the victim of an attempted lynching and claimed that suspicious-looking persons had stolen his wallet. His lawyer was present at the hearing.

This search warrant was to remain valid for 20 years as required by the relevant domestic legislation for the crime of homicide. The Bakırköy public prosecutor was also informed about this warrant.

  The warrant had been issued by a Magistrate of the then Hove Magistrates' Court on 10 December 1992.   The applicant states that he was not shown an arrest warrant.     21.

When she failed to appear, the court issued a warrant for her arrest under section 83(1)(b) of the 1980 Act.

In the applicant’s case, the warrant of execution had been issued as a result of the initiation of criminal proceedings against her for smuggling.

    The Court notes that in the present case the search of the applicant’s home was conducted under a warrant issued by the Town Court.

Thus, the proceedings ended on 6 July 2001 when the Dubrovnik Municipal Court declared the execution warrant inadmissible.

The High Court later decided that the appeal was to have suspensive effect as regards the arrest warrant. By decision of 20 April 1995, the High Court confirmed the warrant.

The presiding magistrate was different from the one who issued the provisional arrest warrant.

    An investigator, V.Ch., issued a decision to carry out a personal search of the applicant without a judicial warrant, in urgent circumstances.

The nine charges listed in the seven-page long warrant of arrest related to numerous acts presumably committed by the applicant together with eight coaccused in the provinces of Ferrara, Verona, Rovigo

  Under Section 208 a prosecutor could issue a warrant of arrest, ordering that a person suspected of having committed an offence be arrested and brought before him.

The court issued the warrant authorising the seizure of Günlük Evrensel 's two recent issues. 11.

. # Walter Schmid. # Demande de décision préjudicielle: Berufungssenat V der Finanzlandesdirektion für Wien, Niederösterreich und Burgenland - Autriche. # Notion de 'juridiction nationale' au sens de l'article

  The court noted that it was unnecessary to decide whether the danger of suppression of evidence, mentioned in the arrest warrant of 24 July 1991, still existed.

An international warrant for the applicant's arrest was issued on 6 August 1985.