CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

10 526 résultats pour « Bessala »

Tous
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
CC
CE
TA
CAA
CA
CPH
TJ
TCOM
CJUE
Prud'h.
Conv. coll.
BOFIP
IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0330DEC001124003

Admin. suprême

30 mars 2006

30 mars 2006

On an unspecified date, the mayor of Kılıçlı filed a petition, on behalf of the residents, with the office of the Prime Minister and requested permission to return to their village.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC000331006

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2011

15 novembre 2011

    On 8 February 2005 Vizkon Ltd instituted proceedings on behalf of the State against the first applicant, seeking to oblige him to allow a valuation of his house and sign an agreement on the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0629DEC004270205

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2010

29 juin 2010

agreement which, inter alia , authorised the former to negotiate directly with the owners of the property subject to expropriation and, should such negotiations fail, to institute court proceedings on behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-123827

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2013

11 juillet 2013

    However, the return order was again quashed by the Supreme Court, on 27   July 2011, following an extraordinary appeal on points of law lodged by the Prosecutor General on behalf of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107DEC005822110

Admin. suprême

7 novembre 2017

7 novembre 2017

Since that date no subsequent letters from the applicant, his representative or any other person acting in his interests or on his behalf have been submitted to the Court. THE FACTS A.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-164136

Admin. suprême

27 mai 2016

27 mai 2016

It further complained about the impossibility to adduce evidence on its behalf and to have an oral hearing before the Supreme Court.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-169584

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2016

17 novembre 2016

    Other relevant information On 17 September 2013 the first applicant informed the Court that she had lodged an application with the Court on behalf of herself and the second applicant.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1018DEC001040517

Admin. suprême

18 octobre 2022

18 octobre 2022

    On the same date the applicant lodged a civil claim against E. on her and V.’s behalf, seeking custody of the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-144967

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

Its appeal was annulled on 3 August 2005 for failure on its behalf to have paid the legal fees.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-113196

Admin. suprême

31 août 2012

31 août 2012

Those acts perpetrated within the knowledge and at the request of the terrorist organisation were committed on behalf of it.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0619DEC001611410

Admin. suprême

19 juin 2012

19 juin 2012

The relevant parts of the Minister’s letter read: “With reference to the request made concerning a right to retrial on behalf of Petrit Sulejmani given his trial in absentia , we hereby inform you that

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0506DEC006643201

Admin. suprême

6 mai 2004

6 mai 2004

In respect of the above proceedings that the applicant had instituted on behalf of numerous pensioners and which were pending before the Court of Cassation, the latter by numerous judgments given in 1999

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120DEC002172708

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2009

20 janvier 2009

The Court notes that the application was lodged on 2 May 2008 in the form of an introductory letter signed and sent by the applicant’s representative who stated that she was acting on the applicant’s behalf

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:0503DEC001296087

Admin. suprême

3 mai 1988

3 mai 1988

  Furthermore he submits that the Court proceedings were unfair in particular on the ground that his confession had been extorted and that the Assize Court did not examine witnesses on his behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0910DEC002759495

Admin. suprême

10 septembre 1997

10 septembre 1997

He brings the application both in his own name and on behalf of his late daughter, born in 1970 and deceased in 1988.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-140190

Admin. suprême

19 décembre 2013

19 décembre 2013

Following a claim of the first applicant acting on his own and on behalf of the second applicant, on 6 June 2011 Smolninskiy District Court, St   Petersburg, ordered the City Administration to provide

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0416DEC005646421

Admin. suprême

16 avril 2024

16 avril 2024

(“the second applicant”), who were born in 1950 and 1974 respectively, and who lodged the application on behalf of themselves and their child (“the third applicant”; together “the applicants”), who was

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0424DEC001140224

Admin. suprême

24 avril 2025

24 avril 2025

    The Court observes that the applicant was L.’s legal representative and thus, in principle, had the authority to act on her behalf.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD001410202

Admin. suprême

10 avril 2012

10 avril 2012

The representative was invited to submit observations on behalf of her client by 24 November 2005 but failed to do so.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1988:1214DEC001248986

Admin. suprême

14 décembre 1988

14 décembre 1988

  Moreover, the Court, having heard several witnesses on the applicant's behalf, found that he had failed to establish his alibi.   Finally, the Court believed him capable of such a crime.

Source officielle

Page 66 sur 527

← PrécédentSuivant →