DBVM-V-B7E-KQ5A N° Minute : C3 Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à la SELARL LEXAVOUE GRENOBLE - CHAMBERY la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

Subsequently, on 27   May 2010 the first instance court delivered a decision in his favour.

By a judgment of 7 August 2002 the Leninskiy District Court of Orenburg (“the District Court”) recovered in his favour from the military commissariat of the Orenburg Region unpaid social allowance and

Romania (no. 15402/04) In this case, the applicants complained about the cancellation of a final judicial decision in their favour, in a dispute concerning the restitution of a nationalised building.

It found that the 1995 restitution decision was valid, and that, as provided under domestic law, it had given rise to title to property in favour of the restitution owner, despite the land having been

  2911), disseminating propaganda in favour of the PKK, an illegal organisation under section 7(2) of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (Law no.

There were therefore no grounds to conclude that, at the time they applied to the domestic courts in 2005 under the section concerned, there had existed a proprietary interest in their favour which was

    The applicant initiated compensation proceedings against his former employer, and subsequently on 7 October 2009 the Diyarbakır Labour Court delivered a decision in his favour.

Romania (no. 5381/04) This case concerned the applicant’s complaint that the Romanian authorities failed to enforce a final judgment in her favour.

    The applicant complained under Article 3 of the Convention that the failure to enforce the final judgment in her favour had amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment. 2.

    The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of the domestic decision given in her favour. She relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article   1 of Protocol No.

    The applicant complained principally of the non-enforcement of the domestic decision given in his favour.

N° RG 24/01604 - N° Portalis DBVM-V-B7I-MHHP N° Minute : Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Me Pierre ALBERT la SELARL CABINET LAURENT FAVET

Respect for family life Mother living with her adopted daughter since the date of the foreign adoption order: article   8 applicable Refusal to enforce a full adoption order by a foreign court in favour

    The applicant complained of the non-enforcement of a domestic decision issued in his favour against the Sarajevo Canton.

be illusory if a Contracting State’s domestic legal system allowed a final, binding judicial decision – creating an established right to payment or to have certain actions taken in the applicant’s favour

en cette qualité, Immatriculée au registre du commerce et des sociétés de PARIS sous le numéro 890 351 042, Dont le siège social est situé [Adresse 1] [Localité 6] Représentée par Me Benoît FAVOT

He stated that he had not intended to disseminate propaganda in favour of the PKK or to praise a criminal. 9.

The easements in favour of the housing cooperative, concerning the use of the six   flats, were preserved. 8.