that there was no law limiting the jurisdiction of the Court of Cassation to examine such cases.

  The case is numbered 62/1995/568/654.   The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).

when it came to the question of availability of health care.

N° RG 25/00705 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7J-GWUV Minute : GMC JCP Copie exécutoire à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY - RENDA - KARM, avocats au barreau de CHARTRES,

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE CHARTRES N° RG 24/00227 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7I-GHXV Minute : 24/ JCP Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY - RENDA

TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE CHARTRES N° RG 24/00245 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7I-GH6O Minute : 24/ JCP Copie exécutoire délivrée le : à : Maître Mathieu KARM de la SCP MERY - RENDA

N° RG 26/00017 - N° Portalis DBXV-W-B7K-GZDD Minute : GMC JCP Copie exécutoire à : SCP MERY - RENDA - KARM, avocats au barreau de CHARTRES, vestiaire : T 35 [D] [P]

  In the case of Horhat v.

The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.

The Government did not submit any observations on the admissibility and/or merits of the present case.

The Court also did not identify any special features capable of bringing the facts of the present case under the jurisdiction of Spain for the purposes of Article   1: –   the mere nationality

    The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case. THE LAW 8.

may, in exceptional cases, request that the case be referred to the 17 ‑ member Grand Chamber of the Court.

“had been sitting on this video-cassette, also forgetting to place it under seal, for over a month after the case was withdrawn from them”.

    The Court notes at the outset that the present case concerns essentially the same issue as the Moskal case and the other similar cases against Poland previously examined by the Court, namely

In the case of Abdullah Yıldız v.

né en à ... 95540 MERY SUR OISE représenté par Me Sophie DAGANNAUD, avocat au barreau de PARIS **************** DEFENDERESSE DEVANT LA COUR DE RENVOI S.A.S.

The solicitors referred to the Allock and Others case lodged with this Court (now Berry and Others ) which, they explained, was lodged on behalf of “some 60+ nurses and care workers seeking compensation

    The case concerns the length of proceedings in which the first applicant requested a foster care permission with respect to her grandchildren, who had been left without parental care.