CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes

142 749 résultats pour « More CE »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-186739

Admin. suprême

11 septembre 2018

11 septembre 2018

More specifically, was its interpretation consistent with the essence of the offence at issue and reasonably foreseeable; and was it in line with the wording of the relevant provisions of the criminal

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4707

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2003

16 septembre 2003

An agreement was reached between the applicant and the insurance company to renovate more restaurant premises, for which the applicant had to pay an amount of money and its monthly rent was raised.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-231654

Admin. suprême

22 février 2024

22 février 2024

December 2022 the applicant, a food delivery courier, uploaded a short video of himself on TikTok, a popular video-hosting system, in which he, by swearing in an obscene manner at the Mayor of Tbilisi and, more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;RESOLUTIONS;EXECUTION;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-71912

Admin. suprême

12 novembre 2003

12 novembre 2003

awarded to the applicant by the Court, within one week, i.e. 19 November 2003 at the latest,   Declares the Committee's resolve to take all adequate measures against Turkey if Turkey fails once more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1425

Admin. suprême

7 juillet 2009

7 juillet 2009

Since Mr Dupin had died more than seven months before his representatives introduced the application in his name, the case had not been brought by a person who could be regarded as an applicant for the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4533

Admin. suprême

29 janvier 2004

29 janvier 2004

Inadmissible under Article 35 – As supervisory review was more akin to a retrial and could be lodged at any time after a judgment became enforceable, if such a procedure were admitted as a remedy for the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-179524

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2017

22 novembre 2017

QUESTION tO THE PARTIES In the light of the applicants’ claims and the documents which have been submitted, more specifically the documents from the UNHCR, and in light of information set out in the UK

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-196778

Admin. suprême

16 septembre 2019

16 septembre 2019

    Did the applicant have at her disposal an effective domestic remedy for her complaint under Article 2, more particular in respect of the unreasonable length of the investigation, as required

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-68248-68716

Admin. suprême

11 juillet 2000

11 juillet 2000

The proceedings lasted more than ten years.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-1742

Admin. suprême

22 janvier 2009

22 janvier 2009

As a result the police blocked more than   50   churches and monasteries in the country, evicted the religious ministers and staff who identified themselves with the alternative Synod, and formally

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-2396593-2578501

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

The Russian authorities misconstrued the relevant provision of the Minsk Convention, which did not provide a legal basis for detention of an initial 40-day period but required that anyone detained for more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:0225DEC001710690

Admin. suprême

25 février 1991

25 février 1991

give such an order after a reasoned, dated and signed advice by at least two behavioural experts of different disciplines - among whom one psychiatrist -, who have examined the person concerned not more

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:1021DEC003997798

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1998

21 octobre 1998

He submits that the Edirne Public Prosecutor started criminal proceedings against him on 18 May 1989 and that the Court of Cassation delivered its final judgment on 25 December 1996, more than seven years

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1815581-1904685

Admin. suprême

19 octobre 2006

19 octobre 2006

  The applicants have had no news of Zeki since his arrest more than 12 years ago.   2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0309DEC006003800

Admin. suprême

9 mars 2004

9 mars 2004

Since none of the parties requested the resumption of the case for more than six months, on 21 October 1999 the case ceased to exist.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1213DEC006817501

Admin. suprême

13 décembre 2005

13 décembre 2005

However, the application was introduced only on 20 March 2001, that is, more than six months later.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-4790

Admin. suprême

8 juillet 2003

8 juillet 2003

In a supplement to a further Consultation Paper published in 1995, it was stated that the scheme allowed more noise than had been experienced in 1988, contrary to Government policy, but after a further

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0120DEC004850999

Admin. suprême

20 janvier 2000

20 janvier 2000

It concluded that:   “It is difficult to imagine an appeal which is more frivolous or vexatious than this one.”

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-12322

Admin. suprême

31 janvier 2019

31 janvier 2019

A more restrictive surveillance procedure was also available, applied at the beginning of a patient’s stay and whenever considered necessary by the treating doctor.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-163230

Admin. suprême

27 avril 2016

27 avril 2016

In particular, in the first applicant’s case, the regional court concluded that more than 10% of voter signatures collected in the support of the first applicant had been invalid.

Source officielle

Page 66 sur 7138

← PrécédentSuivant →

BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.