Rezard, magistrat désigné ; - les observations de Me Da Costa, représentant M. F, présent, assisté de M.

Austria - 12398/86 Judgment 26.4.1991 Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Criminal conviction based in part on the statements made by a witness before a police officer and read out at the

The court ordered the publication of a judicial notice in Paris Match to inform readers of the interference with private life thus constituted.

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights on account of her sexual orientation, contrary to Article   14 of the Convention read in conjunction

Did the applicant have an “arguable claim” that there had been a violation of her rights under Article 13 read in conjunction with Article   6 §   1 about the allegedly protracted criminal investigation

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on the ground of his disability, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read together with Article   8 of the Convention, in the exercise

applicants expressly referred in the application form they submitted to that court – compatible with the obligation to provide an effective remedy within the meaning of Article   13 of the Convention read

His statement given in the investigative stage, including the photo identification, was read by the trial court and was the key evidence relied on by the court deciding to convict the applicant.

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination on grounds of sexual orientation, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Article 8?

italic }   Published on 31 May 2021   FIFTH SECTION Application no. 19632/20 Z.A. against Ireland lodged on 5 May 2020 communicated on 10 May 2021 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE Invoking Article 8, read

The witness D.L., a minor at the time of the applicant’s trial, was not cross-examined in open court and her pre-trial statements were read out as evidence.

Ali-Reza X..., la décision du préfet du Rhône en date du 19 juin 1991 refusant à M.

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination in the enjoyment of her Convention rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention?

In particular, did the domestic judicial authorities comply with their positive obligations under Article 10 of the Convention read in the light of Article 11 to secure the right of the applicant to freedom

United Kingdom citizen resident in Northern Ireland, to have an abortion in England free of charge under the National Health Service in late 2012 breached their rights under Article 14 of the Convention read

    Did the applicants suffer discrimination in the enjoyment of their property rights, contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1, given that

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Was the refusal by the administrative authorities of the applicant’s request for a paid maternity leave contrary to Article 14 of the Convention read in conjunction with

    Has the applicant suffered discrimination contrary to Article 14 of the Convention, read in conjunction with Articles 3, 5, 6, 8 or 13 of the Convention, compared to other psychiatric patients

  QUESTION TO THE PARTIES Has there been a violation of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article   5 § 1 in the applicant’s case (see, for example, Clift v. the United Kingdom , no. 7205/07

Austria - 13161/87 Judgment 28.8.1992 Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Criminal conviction based in part on statements made to the police and the investigating judge by a witness and then read