CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC000912613
8 janvier 2019
After re-examination of all the evidence in the file, the court reached the same conclusion as the prosecutor. The decision was final. 4.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD005268315
19 juillet 2018
The domestic courts continued to rely on the same grounds for detention as in their previous decisions.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD001075321
28 novembre 2023
The fact that the applicant was at the same time allowed to make telephone calls to his family members and correspond through written letters does not alter that finding.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD004341117
14 janvier 2025
In addition, they complained about the length of the constitutional proceedings, which had lasted from 9 August 2012 to 9 May 2017. 20.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003932798
23 mars 1999
On the same day, he was taken into custody ( inverzekeringstelling ) and was subsequently held for questioning for the next three days. He was released on 19 September 1991.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103DEC002677107
3 novembre 2009
The applicant rejected the offer and in the same year proceedings were initiated before the Land Arbitration Board (“LAB”).
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0222JUD003508702
22 février 2005
Therefore, the period of debt recovery in the applicant's case has so far lasted six years and three months. 28.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD002095092
1 juillet 1997
  Where further parts of the same       statute are, for the same reasons, incompatible with the       Basic Law or any other part of federal law,
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD001782091
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD003951311
29 juin 2021
Subsequently, on 23 September 2006, C.A. had come across the same vehicle and noticed that its back seats had been removed.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD003727208
10 octobre 2017
The applicant was placed in detention pending trial on the same day. 8.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000388504
4 décembre 2008
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC001160202
26 juin 2007
The applicant company submitted that the proceedings had lasted over twelve years and that erroneous judgments had repeatedly been remitted for re-examination.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC001329502
22 novembre 2007
On 2   October 2000 he commenced a hunger strike, which apparently lasted for ten days, requesting that a date be set for a hearing in his case.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC006341300
12 décembre 2002
The applicant further complains that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0202DEC003375396
2 février 1999
In the same year, the applicant once again requested that the presiding judge step down, alleging lack of impartiality on his part.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002779195
15 mai 1996
       Accordingly, the proceedings against the applicant lasted for about two years and one month subsequent to the Hungarian ratification of the Convention.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC002099813
27 janvier 2015
The consideration of charges lasted for about a month and a half. 6.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD000150905
22 avril 2010
It thus lasted thirteen years, one month and twenty-four days for pre-trial proceedings and three levels of jurisdiction. 19.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205JUD005196399
5 décembre 2006
Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS 4.
Page 66 sur 348