CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

6 954 résultats pour « Samir Lassoued »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0108DEC000912613

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2019

8 janvier 2019

After re-examination of all the evidence in the file, the court reached the same conclusion as the prosecutor. The decision was final. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0719JUD005268315

Admin. suprême

19 juillet 2018

19 juillet 2018

The domestic courts continued to rely on the same grounds for detention as in their previous decisions.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1128JUD001075321

Admin. suprême

28 novembre 2023

28 novembre 2023

The fact that the applicant was at the same time allowed to make telephone calls to his family members and correspond through written letters does not alter that finding.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0114JUD004341117

Admin. suprême

14 janvier 2025

14 janvier 2025

In addition, they complained about the length of the constitutional proceedings, which had lasted from 9 August 2012 to 9 May 2017. 20.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0323DEC003932798

Admin. suprême

23 mars 1999

23 mars 1999

On the same day, he was taken into custody ( inverzekeringstelling ) and was subsequently held for questioning for the next three days. He was released on 19 September 1991.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1103DEC002677107

Admin. suprême

3 novembre 2009

3 novembre 2009

The applicant rejected the offer and in the same year proceedings were initiated before the Land Arbitration Board (“LAB”).

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0222JUD003508702

Admin. suprême

22 février 2005

22 février 2005

Therefore, the period of debt recovery in the applicant's case has so far lasted six years and three months. 28.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD002095092

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

  Where further parts of the same       statute are, for the same reasons, incompatible with the       Basic Law or any other part of federal law,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:0701JUD001782091

Admin. suprême

1 juillet 1997

1 juillet 1997

  Where further parts of the same       statute are, for the same reasons, incompatible with the       Basic Law or any other part of federal law,

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0629JUD003951311

Admin. suprême

29 juin 2021

29 juin 2021

Subsequently, on 23 September 2006, C.A. had come across the same vehicle and noticed that its back seats had been removed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1010JUD003727208

Admin. suprême

10 octobre 2017

10 octobre 2017

The applicant was placed in detention pending trial on the same day. 8.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1204JUD000388504

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2008

4 décembre 2008

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS I.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626DEC001160202

Admin. suprême

26 juin 2007

26 juin 2007

The applicant company submitted that the proceedings had lasted over twelve years and that erroneous judgments had repeatedly been remitted for re-examination.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1122DEC001329502

Admin. suprême

22 novembre 2007

22 novembre 2007

On 2   October 2000 he commenced a hunger strike, which apparently lasted for ten days, requesting that a date be set for a hearing in his case.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1212DEC006341300

Admin. suprême

12 décembre 2002

12 décembre 2002

The applicant further complains that the proceedings lasted unreasonably long.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0202DEC003375396

Admin. suprême

2 février 1999

2 février 1999

In the same year, the applicant once again requested that the presiding judge step down, alleging lack of impartiality on his part.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:0515DEC002779195

Admin. suprême

15 mai 1996

15 mai 1996

       Accordingly, the proceedings against the applicant lasted for about two years and one month subsequent to the Hungarian ratification of the Convention.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0127DEC002099813

Admin. suprême

27 janvier 2015

27 janvier 2015

The consideration of charges lasted for about a month and a half. 6.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD000150905

Admin. suprême

22 avril 2010

22 avril 2010

It thus lasted thirteen years, one month and twenty-four days for pre-trial proceedings and three levels of jurisdiction. 19.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205JUD005196399

Admin. suprême

5 décembre 2006

5 décembre 2006

Under the provisions of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention, it decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility. THE FACTS 4.

Source officielle

Page 66 sur 348

← PrécédentSuivant →