CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0621JUD000573414
21 juin 2018
The Supreme Court pointed out that it had recently held, in a case concerning arbitration law, that only in particularly grave cases, where the reason for challenge came close to a reason for exclusion
Page 67 sur 440
comm
ECLI:FR:CCASS:2017:CO00697
11 mai 2017
présent, la société La vie au bord de la mer faisait valoir que M.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD002093707
12 juin 2008
In the case of Moroko v.
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-9275
17 décembre 2013
The Supreme Administrative Court had based its decision on the mere fact that the case file had contained classified documents.
cr
6079a88e9ba5988459c4df09
7 février 1967
CASSATION PARTIELLE SUR LE POURVOI DE : 1° X... (GENEVIEVE), VEUVE Y..., AGISSANT TANT EN SON NOM PERSONNEL QU'EN SA QUALITE DE MERE ET TUTRICE LEGALE DE SON FILS MINEUR Y... (PATRICE); 2° Y...
Cour d'Appel
6253c898bd3db21cbdd85b79
5 novembre 2001
S.C.P BOYER LESCAT MERLE INFIRMATION GROSSE DELIVREE LE X... COUR D'APPEL DE TOULOUSE REPUBLIQUE A...
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD006891910
4 septembre 2014
Italy case ((dec.), no.
ECLI:CEDH:002-3354
12 avril 2006
The case concerned a civil servant in the employ of the State education service who had been appointed by the Director of Education as accountant of a school and was responsible, in that capacity, for
ECLI:CEDH:002-11499
19 janvier 2017
The domestic courts had not considered the offending comments in the general context of the case in order to assess the applicants’ intention.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0219DEC001310025
19 février 2026
The payment will constitute the final resolution of the cases.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0203DEC005189817
3 février 2026
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of the list.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1016DEC002905824
16 octobre 2025
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0906DEC001403119
6 septembre 2022
Ra 2018/11/0118), which, in turn, referred to its judgment of 28 February 2017 (case no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0510JUD004805906
10 mai 2011
In the case of Dimitrov and Hamanov v.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0307DEC007786901
7 mars 2006
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicants, may be summarised as follows.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1973:1012DEC000517871
12 octobre 1973
Moreover, the present case was different insofar as, contrary to the Televizier Case, the present applicant sought to force the Netherlands Government to take measures whereby the broadcasting organisations
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0824JUD001439988
24 août 1993
The first number is the case's position on the list of cases referred to the Court in the relevant year (second number).
ECLI:CEDH:002-13010
17 novembre 2020
What was decisive was whether there was a real risk that these laws be applied in practice, which was reported not to be the case in the Gambia at present.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC000868515
20 février 2018
with the health-care services under the same conditions; 2) the term scheduled for a patient to receive the health-care services depends on the medical need for the health-care services.
ECLI:CEDH:002-6847
10 juillet 1998
Its formatting and structure may therefore differ from the Case-Law Information Note summaries.] I. THE GOVERNMENT’S PRELIMINARY OBJECTIONS A.