Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
soc
61372365cd5801467740938e
10 novembre 1999
10 novembre 1999
Mahault, en cassation d'un arrêt rendu le 24 juin 1996 par la cour d'appel de Basse-Terre (Chambre sociale), au profit de la société Tropikal Nettoyage, dont le siège est ...
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-158073
21 septembre 2015
21 septembre 2015
in open court while those witnesses were absent from trials. 4.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112DEC002433806
12 janvier 2010
12 janvier 2010
The court stated that, for reasons beyond the control of the trial court, it had not been possible to conclude the trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:1130DEC002350694
30 novembre 1994
30 novembre 1994
The applicant complains under Article 6 para. 1 of the Convention that contrary to this provision no oral hearing had taken place before the Trial Board and that the Trial Board's decision
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0219DEC001585389
19 février 1992
19 février 1992
by the minutes of the trial which contained handwritten corrections made by the trial court's presiding judge stating that the report in question was read out.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-201307
24 janvier 2020
24 janvier 2020
Did the acoustics inside the glass cabin allow the applicant to follow the course of the trial and participate effectively in the proceedings?
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0520DEC005254418
20 mai 2025
20 mai 2025
On 11 June 2012 the Court of Cassation quashed the above judgment and remitted the case back to the trial court, holding that the trial court had carried out an insufficient examination owing
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227989
7 septembre 2023
7 septembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0630DEC005334319
30 juin 2022
30 juin 2022
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221704
15 novembre 2022
15 novembre 2022
lodged on 23 October 2018 communicated on 15 November 2022 SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE The application concerns the alleged unfairness of criminal proceedings against the applicant on account of the trial
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC004165420
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC000125121
6 octobre 2022
6 octobre 2022
Everyone arrested or detained in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 (c) of this Article shall be ... entitled to trial within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229763
30 novembre 2023
30 novembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based, Prot. 7
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-227998
7 septembre 2023
7 septembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0110DEC000004014
10 janvier 2017
10 janvier 2017
(b) The pre-trial submissions 7.
Source officielleCASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1008JUD001100804
8 octobre 2019
8 octobre 2019
The exceptions provided by the above Article were the following: 1) trials involving state secrets; 2) trials of persons under the age of 16; 3) trial concerning sex crimes or capable of disclosing intimate
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-181103
29 janvier 2018
29 janvier 2018
According to the applicant, the case is being examined by the trial court.
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-221446
7 novembre 2022
7 novembre 2022
Of which significance is the circumstance that the second applicant allegedly bribed the trial panel president to deliver a favourable decision in the trial, and complained about not being tried by an
Source officielleCASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-229891
30 novembre 2023
30 novembre 2023
in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross - examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based.
Source officielleCASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-7414
12 février 2013
12 février 2013
His objection was dismissed and on 24 April 2003 he was convicted by the trial court.
Source officiellePage 67 sur 1635