The applicant alleged a violation of Article 6 § 3 (d) and Article 6 § 1 (fairness and length of proceedings) of the Convention. 4.

    On 19 September 2005 counsel unsuccessfully complained, relying on Article 6 § 3 (b) of the Convention, that because of the frequent hearings they did not have sufficient time to meet with

    The Court reiterates that in accordance with Article 6 § 3 (b) the accused must have the opportunity to organise his defence in an appropriate way and without restriction on the ability to

6, § 3, b, de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. » Réponse de la Cour 8.

préalablement à celle-ci de la tenue du débat contradictoire, de sorte qu'en écartant la nullité de ce débat tirée de l'absence de cette information préalable la chambre de l'instruction a méconnu l'article

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 3 OF THE CONVENTION IN CONNECTION WITH OBTAINING SAMPLES 69.

  3, 5 §   1 et 6 §§   1 et 3 c) et d) de la Convention. 6.

He relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (b) and (c) of the Convention in respect of these complaints. The provisions at issue read as follows: “1.

Greece - 76438/12 Judgment 6.10.2016 [Section I] Article 6 Article 6-3-d Examination of witnesses Admission and use of the incriminating conclusions of an absent expert: no violation Facts – In the course

The applicant relied on Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) of the Convention, which provides in so far as relevant as follows: “1.

    There has therefore been a violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) of the Convention in conjunction with Article 6 § 1 in the present case. B.     Length of proceedings 18.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 and 3 ( c ) OF THE CONVENTION (cassation proceedings) 59.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 92.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION IN RESPECT OF THE FIRST APPLICANT 96.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 §§ 1 AND 3 (c) OF THE CONVENTION 89.

Matyushkin. 3.

Le 6 juillet 1999, la Cour a décidé que la demande d'application de l'article 39 pouvait être envisagée dans l'hypothèse où la condamnation du requérant serait confirmée par la Cour de cassation.

under Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c) relating to the lack of assistance from a lawyer for the first few days of his detention, were communicated to the Government. 4.

    Having regard to the facts of the case, the submissions of the parties, and its findings under Article 3, Article 6 § 1 taken in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c), and Article 13 of the

La Cour conclut aussi, à l’unanimité, à une violation de l’article 6 §§ 1 et 3 c) dans le chef de deux des requérants.