Moreover, because of the absence of defence counsel, he had been unable duly to question witnesses who were present or to obtain the appearance of witnesses on his behalf. 4.

    The applicants alleged, in particular, that they were not able to defend themselves properly, that they were not allowed to obtain the attendance and examination of witnesses on their behalf

The Romanian Helsinki Committee appealed against the judgment on the applicants’ behalf.

    As to further evidence from an employment expert, no doubt to be countered by such a person called on behalf of the Defendant and which would in any event have occasioned further delay and

The Director further stated that the Prison Code (Article   50   § 6) prohibited complaints “on behalf of other prisoners”. The penalty was imposed on account of these breaches.

The representatives commented in their observations on behalf of the applicant that the arguments of the Government were unsubstantiated.

He lodged his application with the Court on behalf of his wife (the second applicant), who died on 25 October 2001, and on behalf of his youngest daughter (the third applicant), born in 1980. I.

The case was brought by him on behalf of the company. He is represented before the Court by Mr   W.   Hermeliński, a lawyer practising in Warsaw, Poland.

The applicant states that he brings the application in the name of his brother, Abdullatif ilhan, who is paralysed and has authorised the applicant to act on his behalf.

applicant’s conviction was based;   Art. 6 (1) - unfair criminal proceedings - various deficiencies in the administrative offence proceedings (impossibility to obtain attendance of a witness on behalf

On 6 April 2001 the Memorial Human Rights Centre wrote to the Prosecutor General’s Office on the applicant’s behalf.

He complains on his own behalf and on behalf of his uncle, Hasim Yasa, who was a Turkish citizen born in 1956 and resident in Diyarbakir until he was shot dead on 14 June 1993.

On behalf of the eighteenth and third applicants, the DUR appealed to a court against those decisions.

They submitted that the applicant had lodged his application before the Court on his own behalf and not on behalf of the said companies.

    On 29 February 1996 the same landowner, again acting on his own and the remaining heirs’ behalf, concluded a similar agreement ( akt   marrëveshje ) with the applicant’s company for

    The first applicant lodged the application on his own behalf and on behalf of his son, the second applicant, who is a minor. 5.

    In conclusion the Court finds that the first applicant has standing to act on his daughter’s behalf. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 8 OF THE CONVENTION 24.

Following the introduction of the application, Mrs Reynolds died and Ms Catherine King (her daughter) continued the case on her behalf.

The lawyer acting on behalf of Mr D.L. had also enclosed with the request evidence of the lawful origin of the money.