hereinafter referred to as "the Convention"),        Having regard to the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Ruiz-Mateos against Spain delivered on 23 June

margin-bottom:0pt } .sBB9EE52A { font-family:Arial } .s76CF415B { page-break-before:always; clear:both } Resolution ResDH(2003)130 concerning the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 11 June

SPAIN   Tuesday, 22 June 1999 at 9 a.m.   The applicants     The case concerns an application (application no.

    PROCEDURE     The application was introduced before the European Commission of Human Rights on 2 June 1998 and registered on 23 June 1998.

In June 2008 and July 2009, respectively, the applicant was granted a temporary visa for visiting her daughter, who had lived in Sweden since 1992.

On 8 June 2010 the Chernihiv Court dismissed the applicant’s claim as unsubstantiated.

As regards the judgements of 23 June 2003 and 19   February 2004, the Government refused to settle the case and provided written observations.

Following an extradition request the first applicant and her husband were extradited, and the second applicant expelled, to Russia on 17 June 1993.

In their observations of 16 June 2005 the Government informed the Court that the judgment in the applicant’s favour had been enforced by 1 December 2004.

On 25 June 2010 that court found the applicant guilty of having purchased cannabis for personal use and imposed on him a fine of 850 Ukrainian hryvnias.

The applicant appealed against that decision before the Court of Cassation, which declared her appeal inadmissible on 24 May 2017 (served on 16 June 2017).

He was released on conditional release on 7   June 2024.

The detainees received some food and water at 5 a.m. on 13   June 2017. The second meal was provided at 2 p.m.

margin-top:14pt; margin-bottom:12pt; text-align:justify; page-break-inside:avoid; page-break-after:avoid; font-size:14pt } .s3CA22BA { font-family:Arial; text-transform:uppercase } Communicated on 4 June

    On 13 June 1983 the applicant was interrogated, as a witness, by the Messina police.

On 20 June 1995 the court held a hearing. The parties refused to settle the case. The court ordered that A.P., an expert, prepare a report. The expert submitted his report on 5 June 1996.

    The applicant’s questioning by the police on 25 June 2008 The applicant was in charge of a private warehouse.

On 22 June 2005 the insolvency proceedings in respect of the company were completed, and the company was liquidated.

On 2 June 2009 the applicant was acquitted of charges relating to the episode with R.M.

On 4 June 2013 the applicant was arrested by the police as a suspect of the above crime.