CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1205JUD006013200
5 décembre 2006
    On 17 July 1997 the applicant was arrested and taken into police custody by the Anti-terror branch of the Izmir Security Directorate on suspicion of his involvement in an illegal organisation
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1963:1213DEC000174762
13 décembre 1963
opinions - or by training youth groups, whose members patterned their lives on the boy-scout movement, but with a national bias - there was never any question of training or using them for acts of terror
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1014DEC001852702
14 octobre 2008
The psychological repercussions of the attack on a young child's mind were very serious – they had caused his son feelings of terror.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:1222JUD003719408
22 décembre 2015
#xa0; Article 180 § 1 of this Act reads as follows: “Responsibility for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another’s property, when it results from violent acts or terror
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0405DEC001371088
5 avril 1990
          We shall observe the further course of the proceedings against [J.] and trust that you will leave the path of terrorisation which you have embarked upon
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0324JUD002285702
24 mars 2005
1996 and 112/1999) provided as follows: Section 180(1) “Liability for loss caused by death or bodily injury or by damage or destruction of another's property, when it results from acts of violence or terror
PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1872726-1974823
19 décembre 2006
  The Court held unanimously that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the failure to notify the applicant, before the hearing, of the tenor of the advocate general’s submissions
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1119DEC003293910
19 novembre 2013
  »   (§   10) «   Les ténors de l’opposition nationale et d’autres observateurs reprochent au gouvernement congolais d’avoir entrepris systématiquement de consolider son pouvoir, de
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1995:0404REP001887791
4 avril 1995
electoral body (exapatisi eklogeon), an offence under Article 162 of the Greek Penal Code, because in the leaflet they had stated that the candidates of the main political parties had created a climate of terror
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0229DEC004196498
29 février 2000
  A report was drafted on 10 June 1992 at the scene of the incident by four officers from the Anti-Terror Department.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1206DEC000435316
6 décembre 2016
also understands the circumstances in South-Eastern Turkey, where an armed, separatist organisation, recognised as terrorist by the EU, NATO and many countries, has systematically used violence and terror
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0513DEC001112184
13 mai 1986
even if Art. 7 (Art. 7) of the Convention were not taken to require such express support in the law for conviction of an accused but can be taken to allow criminalisation on the basis of the general tenor
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0212JUD001382406
12 février 2013
strings to become director”; who “aspires to the title of the most dreadful social climber in Sinaia” (“ aspiră la titlul de cel mai incrâncenat parvenit din Sinaia ”); and who “started a campaign of terror
ECLI:CEDH:003-2358176-2549107
22 mai 2008
24252/04) In this case the Court unanimously found the above violation on account of the fact that the applicant had not been provided with a copy of the reporting judge’s report or informed of the tenor
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD005847317
17 mars 2026
detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état of 15   July 2016 on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0220DEC001813991
20 février 1992
    When directing the jury on the question of damages,       the tenor of the learned judge's remarks was in large       part to urge the
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2026:0317JUD000254119
applicants in the aftermath of the attempted coup d’état of 15   July 2016, primarily on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terror
ECLI:CEDH:003-1386674-1447859
28 juin 2005
France , the Court also concluded that there had been a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the fact that the tenor of the advocate-general’s submissions had not been made available to the applicant
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1116DEC003027806
16 novembre 2010
Section 166 provides for the State’s responsibility for any damage caused, inter alia , by a bodily injury sustained as a result of acts of violence or terror.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-174183
12 mai 2017
Page 69 sur 90
BODACC temporairement indisponible. Les annonces n’ont pas pu être vérifiées. Les résultats de jurisprudence restent consultables.