CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0327DEC002181003
27 mars 2008
They were supported in their efforts by the SRJI.
Page 69 sur 6767
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0711JUD007045510
11 juillet 2023
The domestic courts, while rejecting the applicant’s motion for further evidence in this respect, did not reason that the data about the border crossing in the passport were not reliable, or that there
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0401JUD002538204
1 avril 2010
There they confessed that they had committed the offence and gave explanations on the manner in which they had acted. On the same day the victim of the offence was questioned. 5.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0606DEC002880704
6 juin 2006
The fact that they were not practising medicine, that the acts were committed in the context of their work as journalists and that they did not invoke their status as doctors is not capable of precluding
CASELAW;CLIN;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:002-3239
18 juillet 2006
They used a metal ram to make a hole in the door. On finding no one but the applicants in the house, the police sergeant apologised and arranged for repairs to be made to their front door.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0123DEC001624002
23 janvier 2007
The decision to take X away from them was therefore in breach of Article 8 and violated their right to respect for their family life. THE LAW 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0909JUD002472917
9 septembre 2025
They unleash the Taliban [fundamentalists] in our town, teach them how to trick and hide, drive them around in their private cars, lying to policemen to get away.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1202JUD003085603
2 décembre 2010
They further alleged that their eviction would render them homeless and infringe their Constitutional right to respect for their home and, moreover, the second applicant's eviction would jeopardize the
ECLI:CEDH:002-9186
5 décembre 2013
Law – Article 8 ( obligation to ensure that the applicants received essential information enabling them to assess the risks to their health and lives ): There was a strong likelihood that the applicants
ECLI:CEDH:002-9536
22 avril 2014
The applicants then applied for judicial review of the decisions to reject their applications, at the same time seeking a stay of execution of the orders for their deportation.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0708DEC003726704
8 juillet 2014
This group spontaneously asked an assistant to the head to the college to let them meet the head.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0502JUD002613295
2 mai 2000
The three women – who wish to remain anonymous – describe their ordeal as nightmarish. They all have internal and external scarring which they will have to live with for the rest of their lives.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC003888406
20 septembre 2007
If the competent authorities, as the applicants claimed, were interfering on the part of the their land which did not fall within the ambit of the road alignment plan, then the act in question would be
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD002926312
3 mars 2015
During the journey the two men told her that they intended to “sell” her as a prostitute to people with whom they were in contact in Blagoevgrad, and then to “take her back” after receiving the money.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0104DEC001115209
4 janvier 2012
Whilst the Court is aware of the reports of human rights abuses in the KRG area of Iraq, it does not find them to be of such a nature as to show, on their own, that there would be a violation of the Convention
ECLI:CEDH:002-4886
15 mai 2003
This was granted by the Court of Appeal, which assumed that the children would quickly adapt to Canada, even if forcibly brought there.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:1209JUD001197603
9 décembre 2008
They maintained, inter alia , that by publishing the article they had been doing their jobs and informing the public.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-238337
7 novembre 2024
They were expecting a fourth child. The applicants’ requests for asylum had been rejected and the authorities had planned a flight to remove them to Nigeria, their country of origin.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0621JUD005795300
21 juin 2007
Several men entered the house very quietly, so the owner of the house, D., did not hear them enter. They woke D. up and gagged her with adhesive tape. Then they demanded her passport.
ECLI:CEDH:001-154291
8 avril 2015
The applicant’s sons A.R. and E.R. claimed that their father had met with Š.A. and another person and that the fight started between the three of them, but when they came to help him, a number of other