During the applicant’s absence from the trial, lawyer S. did not visit him in the remand prison or contact him in any other way to inform him about the evidence examined during the trial. 10 .

in the trial?

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

The young woman was the daughter of Judge M.A. in the criminal section of the Strumica Court (“the trial court”). At the time, it appears that there were four criminal judges at the trial court.

tapes; (ii) that the trial judge had erred in rejecting the applicant’s submission that it was undesirable for him to be called to give evidence; and (iii) that the trial judge had failed to direct the

within a reasonable time or to release pending trial.

    The national courts allowed the pre-trial statements to be read out and admitted these statements as evidence without examination of the witnesses during trials.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.

The 1st Chamber of the Istanbul State Security Court took over the trial.

The trial court did not respond to his application. 22.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - Inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based (Mayorova, final

Initially, the trial court held three hearings per month. 13.

before the trial court. 4.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the conviction was based.

On 6 November 2017 the investigating judge ordered the pre-trial detention of the applicant based on strong indications of guilt as regards the offences he was accused of.

    The Act on the Protection of the Right to a Trial without Undue Delay 42.

    Pre-trial proceedings 7.

trial.

in view of restrictions on the right to examine witnesses - inability to cross-examine in the trial the police officers on whose written statements the applicant’s conviction was based.