CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
Exporter CSV

29 469 résultats pour « Becam »

RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1021DEC003281210

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 2014

21 octobre 2014

Those decisions became final on an unspecified date. On 20 February 2009 the Commercial Court terminated the insolvency proceedings.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1120DEC005210911

Admin. suprême

20 novembre 2018

20 novembre 2018

    In the case of Şefik Demir (cited above) the Court held that that remedy had to be exhausted by the applicants whose convictions became final. It further ruled in its judgment of A.Ş.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-187024

Admin. suprême

17 septembre 2018

17 septembre 2018

That judgment became final in 2006.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1648645-1729737

Admin. suprême

18 avril 2006

18 avril 2006

He was not re-elected, and the PSD candidate became mayor of Vagos.     2.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-704419-713434

Admin. suprême

25 février 2003

25 février 2003

In the absence of an appeal, the judgment became final.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0923DEC005299199

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2004

23 septembre 2004

the fact that the applicant only became aware of the decision later (see Martinus   Godefridus   Aarts v. the Netherlands , no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0612JUD003693902

Admin. suprême

12 juin 2008

12 juin 2008

This judgment became binding immediately and was enforced on 7 March 2003. 9.     On 28 May 2002 the district court awarded the applicant RUB   20,651.78.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9774

Admin. suprême

27 février 1992

27 février 1992

End: date on which District Court's judgment became final ( Arena ) or, at the latest, date on which it could have become final ( G. ) or, again at the latest, date of its execution by the payment of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9778

Admin. suprême

27 février 1992

27 février 1992

End: date on which District Court's judgment became final ( Arena ) or, at the latest, date on which it could have become final ( G. ) or, again at the latest, date of its execution by the payment of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9776

Admin. suprême

27 février 1992

27 février 1992

End: date on which District Court's judgment became final ( Arena ) or, at the latest, date on which it could have become final ( G. ) or, again at the latest, date of its execution by the payment of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-9772

Admin. suprême

27 février 1992

27 février 1992

End: date on which District Court's judgment became final ( Arena ) or, at the latest, date on which it could have become final ( G. ) or, again at the latest, date of its execution by the payment of the

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0220DEC000032510

Admin. suprême

20 février 2018

20 février 2018

of Article 35 § 1 to take the start of the six-month period from the date when the applicant first became or ought to have become aware of those circumstances (see Paul and Audrey Edwards v. the United

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:1006DEC004815418

Admin. suprême

6 octobre 2022

6 octobre 2022

Special considerations could apply in exceptional cases, where an applicant first avails himself of a remedy and only at a later stage becomes aware, or should have become aware, of circumstances which

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:1021DEC004529099

Admin. suprême

21 octobre 1999

21 octobre 1999

This decision became final on 1   October 1996.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-10942

Admin. suprême

17 novembre 2015

17 novembre 2015

Turkey - 611/12 Judgment 17.11.2015 [Section II] Article 6 Administrative proceedings Article 6-1 Access to court Limitation period commencing on date of incident rather than date applicants became aware

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-11761

Admin. suprême

14 septembre 2017

14 septembre 2017

close of judicial proceedings lodged in 1994 against the National Social Security Agency concerning the recalculation of a pension, the applicant obtained a judgment in his favour on appeal, which became

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004112014

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

The court found that the judgment of 2   September 2013 had been sent to the representative only on 16 September 2013, that is after the judgment became final. 11.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-181792

Admin. suprême

23 février 2018

23 février 2018

After the said judgment became final on 31 July 2006, considering that their land had been expropriated de facto , the applicants initiated compensation proceedings before the civil courts.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;GENERAL;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-1660937-1742444

Admin. suprême

3 mai 2006

3 mai 2006

As the applicant did not appeal on points of law, his conviction became final on 15 January 2000.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0520JUD003739411

Admin. suprême

20 mai 2014

20 mai 2014

A had paid the taxes and tax surcharges entirely before the charge became pending.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 1474

← PrécédentSuivant →