Ce magistrat a rendu compte des plaidoiries au tribunal composé de : Thomas BOTHNER, Vice-Président Gyslain DI CARO DEBIZET, Magistrat Aglaé PAPIN, Magistrat qui en ont délibéré.

    According to the applicant, the hearing before the court in both cases was very brief.

  Necessary in a democratic society Reasons for original decision to prohibit children's removal were both relevant and sufficient for purposes of Article 8.

There had thus been an interference with both applicants’ right to protection of their family life.

  Both were found guilty after a hearing before the prison governor, in which neither was legally represented.

Both cases were transmitted to the Court on 1 November 1998 and declared partly admissible on 3 October 2002.

Following the events, both applicants were subsequently convicted for their involvement in organising mass disorder.

  Both applicants appealed against this decision to the Ministry of Justice.

On an unspecified date the experts found that it would be beneficial to A. to maintain contact with both parents. He was equally attached to both of them.

Both applicants were remanded in custody upon a decision of an investigator and approved by the Prosecutor’s Office. They both appealed against their detention without success.

Adresse 4] [Localité 2] non représentée En application des dispositions de l’article 802 du code de procédure civile, l’affaire a été débattue le 06 Juin 2025 en audience publique devant Thomas BOTHNER

He knew that he was the biological father of both boys. He also acknowledged that in several e-mails and text messages to her.

real estate register dated 21/08/2007; for the apartment (2) - inheritance certificate dated 21/07/1998; for the private house (3) - ownership certificate and extract from the real estate register, both

communicated to the Government and the remainder of both applications was declared inadmissible.

Both parties to the criminal trial also joined a civil complaint to the criminal one.

Both applicants brought libel actions against the President, seeking retraction of the impugned statements and damages.

The autopsy reports in both cases revealed the presence of very high doses of controlled (some also illegal) substances, namely, methadone and benzodiazepines (both applications), as well as cannabinoids

  Merits of the complaint Deletion of certain passages in letter: undisputed interference with both applicants’ right to respect for their correspondence.

Valeriu Griţco,   Dmitry Dedov, judges , and Stephen Phillips, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 9 July 2014, Having regard to the interim measure indicated to both

    In both cases State-funded lawyers were appointed to assist the applicant.