CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1011JUD005365907
11 octobre 2016
The second is a pro forma statement ( объяснение ), filled in by Captain N.
Page 7 sur 19
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:1205DEC003557497
5 décembre 2000
Section 15 of the 1968 Act, insofar as relevant, read as follows: “1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0215JUD003785097
15 février 2007
The facts of the case are in dispute between the parties and may be summarised as follows. A. The applicant's version of the facts 9.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0626JUD002734102
26 juin 2007
The relevant provisions in force at the material time provided as follows: Article 9 “...The Administration shall not impose any sanction resulting in a restriction of personal liberty.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:1017JUD006735113
17 octobre 2023
Captain M.M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0713JUD004566199
13 juillet 2010
She allegedly bribed Captain U. with some cigarettes in order to be allowed to give her husband the food and to talk to him for a few minutes in the presence of Captain U.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0926DEC004479298
26 septembre 2002
The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0703JUD000718803
3 juillet 2008
It follows from the statement by Lieutenant D. that Private Chember serves under his command.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1007JUD006918001
7 octobre 2010
The on ‑ duty officers – Chief Sergeant G.P. and Captain V.S. – placed Mr Karandja in a cell on the third floor of the station.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0122DEC003976806
22 janvier 2013
The parties’ submissions and the relevant documents may be summarised as follows. A. Seizure of the applicant’s truck 3.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000851608
17 janvier 2017
It follows that responsibility for the ill-treatment lies with the domestic authorities. 43.
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0423JUD002936910
23 avril 2015
Captain I. confirmed A’s accusations concerning him. 18.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0604JUD004899814
4 juin 2024
The relevant parts of the experts’ opinion read as follows: “... T. Varyan did not suffer from any psychiatric disorder.
PRESS;GENERAL;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-1659493-1738894
27 avril 2006
However, his mental condition worsened again once his commanding officer, Captain U., had returned to the barracks.
PRESS;GCJUDGMENTS;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:003-2485335-2691019
19 septembre 2008
He was charged with having commanded, as captain, a 15-strong squad in an assignment, on 26 October 1956, to regain control of the Tata Police Department building, which had been taken over by insurgents
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1003DEC004582499
3 octobre 2002
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0110DEC000868102
10 janvier 2006
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1025DEC003920302
25 octobre 2005
On 1 January 1995 the applicant was discharged from the Russian naval forces with the rank of senior captain.
ECLI:CEDH:003-585176-588823
11 juillet 2002
(1) Capitanio v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0626JUD004485310
26 juin 2012
He invoked Article 5 § 1 of the Convention which, in so far as relevant, reads as follows: “1. Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.