CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0323DEC004659519
23 mars 2021
The transfer of the applicant and her children from the Netherlands to Italy, scheduled for 9 September 2019, was announced to the Italian authorities by email on 23 August 2019, by means
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-114951
14 décembre 2010
and institutional representation through various consultative councils ... ... v. invite member states: a. to take account of the phenomenon of expatriation, its benefits and challenges, in their emigration
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1107JUD002470315
7 novembre 2017
By email the same day, X’s lawyer submitted that X had not distributed the picture online; it had been posted for a closed group of friends on Instagram and others had distributed it.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:0130JUD002580194
30 janvier 2001
These included the applicant; Avni Dulaş her son; and Emin Bulen, a villager.
ECLI:CEDH:001-212588
23 septembre 2021
If so, was that “interference” “prescribed by law” and “necessary in a democratic society” to attain one or more of the aims set out in Article 10 § 2 (see, mutatis mutandis , Pastörs v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD004828407
18 octobre 2011
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by five Bulgarian nationals, Mr Ivan Iliev Singartiyski, Mr Angel Ivanov Bezev, Mr Vasil Georgiev Stoychev, Mr Emil
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1018JUD003804704
The Court further reiterates that to fall under Article 3 of the Convention ill-treatment must attain a minimum level of severity.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0704JUD004432213
4 juillet 2017
In addition he had tried to contact A, via telephone and email, when preparing the news piece.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002097292
16 décembre 1997
List of Agents Belgium : Etablissements Emile Bruylant (rue de la Régence 67, B-1000 Bruxelles) Luxembourg : Librairie Promoculture (14, rue Duchscher (place de
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1108JUD002248505
8 novembre 2011
21954/93, ECHR 1999-III, §§ 91-92; Mehmet Emin Yüksel v. Turkey , no. 40154/98, § 37, 20 July 2004; Menesheva v. Russia , no.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0618DEC007387411
18 juin 2013
On 23 November 2011 the Federal Asylum Office sent an email to the association Arciconfraternita San Trifone informing them of the rejection of the applicant’s asylum request in the first
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1018DEC004943714
18 octobre 2016
contradictory statements regarding any permission given by Mr S. for their son’s resettlement in the Netherlands, the Regional Court found that documentary evidence introduced by the applicant, including an email
ECLI:CEDH:001-214415
23 novembre 2021
0.75pt; border-left-style:solid; border-left-width:0.75pt; padding-right:5.03pt; padding-left:5.03pt; vertical-align:top } Published on 13 December 2021 SECOND SECTION Application no. 30689/17 Emin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0911JUD005196799
11 septembre 2007
The officers finally referred their case to the Minister of Justice for the latter to lodge an appeal with the Court of Cassation ( Yazılı emir ile bozma ) against their conviction.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0920DEC001765405
20 septembre 2007
claimed that fear of revenge prevented approximately 182 children from attending school in 2006, 86 of whom were permanently confined to their houses. 3.6.4 Police investigations into the 2004 murder of Emin
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0826JUD001700620
26 août 2025
In its email of 3 February 2020, the State Prosecutor replied that its review of the case had not been confined to the police’s classification of the alleged offences.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0321JUD001010320
21 mars 2024
On 6 July 2017 the applicant NGO sent an email to the Constitutional Court asking it to disclose information concerning the meetings diaries of Judge J. Przyłębska and Judge M.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0526JUD006316416
26 mai 2020
Their registration was confirmed via an email from the press office, which also included a notice of the rules governing the reporting of events within Parliament and a disclaimer stipulating that by entering
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;GRANDCHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708
24 janvier 2017
The measures taken must be designed to address the disadvantage identified and the State must be able to show on what basis they had concluded that the measures chosen would attain that objective.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0609JUD002249693
9 juin 1998
Emüler , Ms M. Anayaroğlu , Advisers ; (b) for the Commission Mr H. Danelius , Delegate ; (c) for the applicant Mr K. Boyle , Barrister-at-Law, Ms A.
Page 7 sur 8