CodexAI
AND
OR
NOT
"…"
DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:1107DEC004854299
7 novembre 2002
On 17 May 2001 the Białystok Regional Court quashed the District Court’s decision of 8 February 2001.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406DEC006841601
6 avril 2004
Pages 3-5 read as follows:   “FIFTY ACRES EVERY MINUTE EVERY year an area of rainforest the size of Britain is cut down or defoliated, and burnt.
CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1992:0113DEC001442288
13 janvier 1992
  It is a matter of a mostly manifest psychotic perception, in which a complex delusionary system with a paranoid colour is predominant.
CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG
ECLI:CEDH:001-192530
18 mars 2019
The passage of time had left many hospitals unable to identify the relevant insurers and, even if they could be traced, the limits of indemnity were in many cases very low as the anticipated value of claims
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1125JUD003971719
25 novembre 2021
He was found to have clear limitations in cognitive skills, as well as in the ability to reflect and “mentalise”.
ECLI:CEDH:001-192528
CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:0415JUD004564418
15 avril 2025
It may be subject to editorial revision.
CASELAW;REPORTS;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:1002REP001236686
2 octobre 1990
     As from May 1986 Susanne stayed overnight every second week-end with the applicant and his wife.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1122DEC003979998
22 novembre 2001
    The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CEDH:001-166714
22 août 2016
The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows. A.     Background 1.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0907DEC003176696
7 septembre 2000
or her skills or conduct.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1002JUD000755410
2 octobre 2014
The mere fact that he was a guard and had higher education might prove that he had sufficient skills to obstruct investigation, but not that he actually intended to do so. 20.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0303JUD000296312
3 mars 2015
In May 2007 he received an indeterminate sentence for public protection (“IPP sentence”). A minimum term (“tariff”) of eighteen months was fixed. 7 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD005828219
19 mai 2022
CROATIA (Application no. 58282/19)         JUDGMENT   STRASBOURG 19 May 2022   This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1210DEC005943510
10 décembre 2013
As to the termination of the public care, it found that the grounds for taking the child into public care persisted, even though the applicant’s interaction skills had improved. 43.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0527DEC002951208
27 mai 2010
The facts of the case, as submitted by the parties, may be summarised as follows.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0907DEC002277193
7 septembre 1999
Her strong point was her verbal skills. Despite her mental disability, she was able to think and express herself in abstract terms and to use language in an adequate manner.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0218JUD000389119
18 février 2020
It may be subject to editorial revision.   In the case of Cînța v.
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:1126JUD002899520
26 novembre 2024
On 11 May 2022 the applicant started to serve his sentence. 24 .
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1110DEC006200717
10 novembre 2020
Court may award to the person such damages (if any) as it considers appropriate.”
Page 7 sur 31