Such a situation cannot be an issue of discrimination under Article   14 of the Convention, but is entirely a matter for the two communities.

Me RAHON 26.8.22 COUR D'APPEL DE BOURGES CHAMBRE SOCIALE ARRÊT DU 26 AOÛT 2022 N° 135 - 9 Pages APPELANTE : Madame [E] [S] [Adresse 1] Ayant pour avocat Me Julio

Turkey, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Julia Laffranque, President,   Jon Fridrik Kjølbro,   Stéphanie Mourou-Vikström, judges

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   February 2014 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, President,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia

Rights (First Section), sitting on 23 June 2015 as a Chamber composed of:   Isabelle Berro, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Khanlar Hajiyev,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia

Under the circumstances, it cannot be said that the applicant has not suffered a significant disadvantage (compare Rinck v. France (dec.), no. 18774/09, 19   October 2010). 23.

    In this last mentioned respect the Court cannot accept the first applicant’s assumption that a specialised agency of the town administration was not competent to deal with the enforcement

In the light of the above, the court cannot release [the applicant] and considers it necessary to extend his detention.” 17.

    In this connection the Court refers to its case-law, which shows that an application for a retrial or other, similar extraordinary remedy cannot, as a general rule, be taken into account

see list appended) The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting on 18   September 2012 as a Committee composed of:   Peer Lorenzen, President,   Elisabeth Steiner,   Julia

Consequently, the applicants cannot be blamed for rejecting this offer (see, a contrario , Bulycheva v. Russia , no.   24086/04, § 31, 8 April 2010). 31.

xa0; SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 4353/16 Cemil ALTUN against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 6   December 2016 as a Chamber composed of:   Julia

Article 381 “If the appeal has been lodged only in favour of the defendant, the judgment cannot be amended to his detriment.”

As a result, it cannot establish whether the applicant had sufficient personal space at the Yalova police headquarters throughout his detention.

European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Nina Vajić, President,   Anatoly Kovler,   Peer Lorenzen,   Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska,   Julia

Section Commerce, suivant déclaration d'appel du 12 septembre 2014, APPELANTE : Société JARDILAND ENSEIGNDES DENOMEE JARDILAND venant Aux droits de la SOCIÉTÉ JARDI SOYAUX représentée par Me Julia

Croatia, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Julia Laffranque, President,   Nina Vajić,   Erik Møse, judges, and André Wampach, Deputy

In the case of Pecotox-Air S.R.L. v. the Republic of Moldova, The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Julia Laffranque, President,   Valeriu

It cannot therefore be held that the applicant’s access to court was “expressly excluded” under the relevant domestic law, as provided under the first condition of the Eskelinen test.