(2) Upon such order being made, such person against whom such order is made, shall be detained in custody until he is removed from Malta: Provided that if the person in respect of whom an expulsion

The applicant was unable to find such a third-party and, thus, remained in custody. 2.

for non-pecuniary damage resulting from such dissemination ... 6.

families and stories around issues such as emigration and bullying.

  Suciu v. Romania (no. 49009/99)   Friendly settlement The applicant, Elena Suciu, is a Romanian national who was born in 1928 and lives in Târgu Mures.

As to whether reafforestation of the land was appropriate, there was conflicting evidence concerning the character of the land, but it was not for the Court to take a position on such a technical matter

Nor did they provide anything to indicate that either of them had ever tried to avail themselves of the legal procedure available in Hungary with a view to obtaining such medication lawfully.

The courts found that there was no legal basis for imposing such a measure, given the applicant’s individual detention regime.

In the instant case the Conseil d’Etat had recapitulated the applicant’s grounds of appeal and had stated that they were not “such as to warrant granting leave” to hear the appeal.

persons had to expect that such restrictions would be imposed on them.

of obtaining extradition – the detention of a person by another State which is not a Party to the Convention (Belarus) have a positive obligation under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention to ensure that such

The application concerns the applicant’s complaint that in spite of his severe visual impairment, attested by a certificate which entitled him to have a person assigned to help him, he was not granted such

On one such occasion, a poster stating “Freedom is not granted, it has to be taken” was publicly exhibited.

The first applicant had not complained about the existence of sex education classes as such but only the fact that they were dispensed to children of between 4 and 8.

National law did not allow such a change as it did not provide for any form of union for same-sex couples.

The court considered that Veropörssi magazine had a journalistic purpose and that it was also in the public interest to publish such data.

Pisti y galva tokiems reikia )”, “You faggots should not post such photographs; such faggots should be given a good kicking ( Pydarai jūs nekelkit fotkes tokias, suspardyt tokius pidarastus )” and “Kill

person who shall have a right to appeal [before the Immigration Appeals Board] against such order in accordance with the provisions of Article 25A: ... (2)     Upon such order being made, such

orders, issue such writs and give such directions as it may consider appropriate for the purpose of enforcing, or securing the enforcement, of the Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms to the enjoyment

In such circumstances, both States and the Court in its supervisory role had to be vigilant to ensure that measures, such as the one at issue, did not give rise to an imbalance that imposed an excessive