CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

135 322 résultats pour « Theis »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0928DEC004322519

Admin. suprême

28 septembre 2021

28 septembre 2021

They did so in their own names, as well as in the name of their children. Their arguments may be summarised as follows. 15.

Page 7 sur 6767

← PrécédentSuivant →
Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-2849

Admin. suprême

15 février 2007

15 février 2007

The applicant produced the complainants’ articles and the relevant extracts from the doctoral thesis which had allegedly been plagiarised.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD001256713

Admin. suprême

16 février 2021

16 février 2021

They should work, learn to respect the laws, learn to meet their obligations, [learn] to pay their taxes and dues. ...” 14 June 2005 edition of the Ataka television programme (on the theme “The Gypsy killers

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0314JUD000563210

Admin. suprême

14 mars 2017

14 mars 2017

They had then blindfolded the applicants, taken them down to the minibus and driven somewhere.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1004DEC003323509

Admin. suprême

4 octobre 2011

4 octobre 2011

This would allow the jury to consider first the case against Robert (including the additional evidence against him which had been given by the three prisoners) and then, if they found Robert guilty, to

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2002:0827DEC007703301

Admin. suprême

27 août 2002

27 août 2002

There is no indication that there were any obstacles preventing them from seeking legal advice as to their position during this period, or that there was any material change in their situation which impacted

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1020DEC000546907

Admin. suprême

20 octobre 2009

20 octobre 2009

The police did not demolish the remaining four sheds but warned those living there that should they not leave the area, their sheds would also be demolished.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-167617

Admin. suprême

20 septembre 2016

20 septembre 2016

The guards then told the applicants that they would give them food if they paid, and took money from their bags and gave them two loaves of bread, a yoghurt, four bottles of Coca-Cola, one kilogram of

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1024JUD004595911

Admin. suprême

24 octobre 2017

24 octobre 2017

from the allowances they received for their children and that there was no guarantee that these were used exclusively to care for the children.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC000560705

Admin. suprême

23 mai 2006

23 mai 2006

They claimed that they had been persecuted in their home country, due to their Armenian ethnicity, and the first applicant, in addition, that she was suffering from the last stages of a fatal illness called

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0530DEC003189096

Admin. suprême

30 mai 2000

30 mai 2000

These persons have taken out their belongings from their houses themselves. There was nobody from the security forces while they were emptying their houses.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-145894

Admin. suprême

30 juin 2014

30 juin 2014

Should he fail to do so, the applicant could contact a bailiff, who should then take the daughters and their documents and hand them over to the applicant.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3020595-3340273

Admin. suprême

11 février 2010

11 février 2010

  The applicants were not eyewitnesses to the abduction and the following account is based on the witness statements collected by them after the disappearance of their relatives.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0923DEC001084112

Admin. suprême

23 septembre 2014

23 septembre 2014

They brought the villagers from Sandallar to Murataga, killed everyone after torturing them and buried them by running over them with a bulldozer on the rubbish dump.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0202DEC002964708

Admin. suprême

2 février 2010

2 février 2010

The applicants could not establish that they had been found liable in the civil proceedings as a result of their non-participation; there had been sufficient evidence against them to lead to such a finding

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0726JUD005794100

Admin. suprême

26 juillet 2007

26 juillet 2007

They dug them out from the debris and buried them in the courtyard. The applicants learnt of this while in Ingushetia. 37.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0710DEC003408105

Admin. suprême

10 juillet 2007

10 juillet 2007

Their request was rejected with reference to the Dublin Convention and the German authorities returned them to Italy, where they had obtained a visa.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0504DEC001111404

Admin. suprême

4 mai 2010

4 mai 2010

They argued that the bearer shares had been transferred to them by a mere handover, as specified under the then applicable rules, after 27 October 1994, the date of their production.

Source officielle
CE

PRESS;CHAMBERJUDGMENTS;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:003-3089796-3420169

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2010

6 avril 2010

  About ten days later they were informed that their placement was the result of an order issued by the deputy director general of the prison administration, but they were not shown the order.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0727JUD002614495

Admin. suprême

27 juillet 2004

27 juillet 2004

They were first taken to the Çarşı Police Station. The police officers forced them to cover their heads with their jackets but the witness was able to see through the parting of his jacket.

Source officielle