CodexAI

par KI

Workspace

Toutes les décisions2.7M+Récentes

Judiciaires

Cour de CassationCour d'AppelTribunal JudiciaireTrib. de Commerce

Administratives

Conseil d'ÉtatCour Admin. d'AppelTrib. Administratif

Codes de loi

Code civilCode du travailCode de commerceCode pénalCode procédure civileCGICode sécu. socialeCode de l'urbanismeCode de l'enviro.Code monétaire fin.

Droit social

Prud'hommes19KConventions coll.26KDoctrine fiscale14K

IA & Outils

IA JuridiqueNEWVeille hebdoNEWMCP ServerAPICitationsStatistiquesAlertes
ConnexionS'inscrire

CodexAI

RechercheJurisprudenceCodesCitationsStatistiquesAlertes
Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"
RechercheDécisionsCodesCPHAlertes
Exporter CSV

2 297 résultats pour « Timeri LAW »

TousCCCETACAACACPHTJTCOMCJUEPrud'h.Conv. coll.BOFIP IA

DÉCISION / ECLI

TYPE

DATE

EXTRAIT

CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0108JUD002511403

Admin. suprême

8 janvier 2009

8 janvier 2009

On 26 December 2007 the authorities credited the latter amount on the applicant’s account. II.     RELEVANT DOMESTIC LAW 13.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0126DEC005421312

Admin. suprême

26 janvier 2016

26 janvier 2016

The Supreme Court noted that the appeal on points of law was not signed by either the applicant or her lawyer, rendering it incomplete.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0925DEC004548313

Admin. suprême

25 septembre 2018

25 septembre 2018

THE LAW 25.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406DEC003650597

Admin. suprême

6 avril 2000

6 avril 2000

  Domestic Law and Practice     Section 12 § 5 of Law no. 104 of 5 February 1992 provides that, once a pupil has been recognised as a handicapped person, a specific educational plan shall

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1115DEC004971608

Admin. suprême

15 novembre 2011

15 novembre 2011

THE LAW 1.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0323DEC006096300

Admin. suprême

23 mars 2004

23 mars 2004

As to the alleged disqualification, the Supreme Court found that lay judge T., who at the relevant time had worked as a special teacher employed by the city of Forssa, had not lacked impartiality.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0125DEC004278402

Admin. suprême

25 janvier 2005

25 janvier 2005

    Relevant domestic law Taxpayers submit yearly tax returns to the local tax authorities.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0214DEC002305503

Admin. suprême

14 février 2006

14 février 2006

unknown to the court at that time.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-127973

Admin. suprême

8 octobre 2013

8 octobre 2013

Tadić, a lawyer practising in Zagreb. The circumstances of the case The facts of the case, as submitted by the applicant, may be summarised as follows.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;CLIN;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:002-14567

Admin. suprême

9 octobre 2025

9 octobre 2025

At the time, however, domestic law only provided for the possibility of filling a seat that became vacant after the start of the parliamentary term; it did not address the situation where an elected MP

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0315DEC005397714

Admin. suprême

15 mars 2022

15 mars 2022

Crnovšanin, a lawyer practicing in Zagreb. The third to fifth applicants were represented by Ms B. Musulin, a lawyer practicing in Zagreb. 2.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0831DEC003882297

Admin. suprême

31 août 1999

31 août 1999

The applicant’s lawyer explained that he had been refused access to the case-file, which had prevented him from preparing a timely appeal.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;COMMITTEE;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0119JUD004625610

Admin. suprême

19 janvier 2021

19 janvier 2021

Bodişteanu, a lawyer practising in Chișinău. 3.     The Government were represented first by their Agent, Mr M. Gurin and later by their Agent ad-interim Ms R. Revencu. 4.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2025:1204DEC001989421

Admin. suprême

4 décembre 2025

4 décembre 2025

THE LAW 7.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1217JUD002036892

Admin. suprême

17 décembre 1996

17 décembre 1996

As the Law does not lay down a time-limit for filing a pleading, a convicted appellant’s pleading may reach the court a few days after his appeal has been dismissed.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;DECCOMMISSION;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:1994:0706DEC002336694

Admin. suprême

6 juillet 1994

6 juillet 1994

        On 31 December 1993, at about 14.30 hrs. the applicants' lawyer was informed by telephone by an officer of the Royal Military Constabulary that Francine at that time

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0517JUD003973112

Admin. suprême

17 mai 2018

17 mai 2018

    As to the question of whether the measure was in accordance with the law, the Court’s case-law has established that a measure must have some basis in domestic law, with the term “law” being

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITYCOM;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2024:0627DEC005995721

Admin. suprême

27 juin 2024

27 juin 2024

Karakış, a lawyer practising in Istanbul.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;JUDGMENTS;CHAMBER;ENG

ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0622JUD005319321

Admin. suprême

22 juin 2023

22 juin 2023

Under Law   no.

Source officielle
CE

CASELAW;COMMUNICATEDCASES;ENG

ECLI:CEDH:001-217087

Admin. suprême

31 mars 2022

31 mars 2022

One of the applicant’s lawyers requested the Disciplinary Chamber to adjourn the hearing due to the fact that the lawyers had not been granted sufficient access to the case file.

Source officielle

Page 7 sur 115

← PrécédentSuivant →