Antoine T..., domicilié [...]                                      , 37°/ à Mme Yasmine UU...  RR...     , domiciliée [...]                       , 38°/ à M.

    The parties’ submissions to the Grand Chamber 1.     The applicants 2.     The Government 3.     The third party intervener C.

Turkey , The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Françoise Tulkens, President,   Ireneu Cabral Barreto,   Vladimiro Zagrebelsky,   Danutė

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel Yalçınkaya v.

    In a decision of 4 November 2010 the Chamber decided to adjourn the examination of the case until the Grand Chamber had delivered its judgment in the case of Nada v.

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    On 3 May 2022 a Chamber of the Second Section decided to relinquish jurisdiction in favour of the Grand Chamber (Article 30 of the Convention and Rule   72). 7.

Adresse 1] représenté par Me Romain CHERFILS de la SELARL BOULAN CHERFILS IMPERATORE, avocat au barreau d'AIX-EN-PROVENCE, assisté par Me Etienne GOUESSE, avocat au barreau de PARIS substitué par Me Yasmine

inline-block }   SECOND SECTION DECISION Application no. 23856/07 Hüseyin İLHAN and others against Turkey The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 27   August 2013 as a Chamber

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

    The broader domestic background and context to the present applications was set out by the Grand Chamber in the case of Yüksel   Yalçınkaya v.

Russia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:   Paul Lemmens, President,   Georgios A.