Juridiction
Tri
DeÀ
Avocat
Opérateurs : AND · OR · NOT · "…"CodexAI
AND · OR · NOT · "…"DÉCISION / ECLI
TYPE
DATE
EXTRAIT
CASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC007745501
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0629DEC003050403
29 juin 2006
29 juin 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0628DEC001546704
28 juin 2007
28 juin 2007
Nielsen, Section Registrar, Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 March 2004, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0128DEC001360605
28 janvier 2010
28 janvier 2010
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1013DEC001519003
13 octobre 2005
13 octobre 2005
Nielsen , Section Registrar , Having regard to the above application lodged on 29 March 2003, Having regard to the decision to apply Article 29 § 3 of the Convention and examine the admissibility and merits
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0302DEC003474604
2 mars 2006
2 mars 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0429DEC000275504
29 avril 2008
29 avril 2008
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0614DEC001343304
14 juin 2007
14 juin 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officiellecr
6079a7f19ba5988459c4b67b
30 juin 1976
30 juin 1976
DU 13 JUILLET 1967 SUR LE REGLEMENT JUDICIAIRE ET LA LIQUIDATION DES BIENS, DES ARTICLES 29-3°, 31, 130 ET 131 DE LA MEME LOI, DE L'ARTICLE 327 DU CODE PENAL, DE L'ARTICLE 402 DU CODE PENAL, DE L'ARTICLE
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0912DEC006716601
12 septembre 2006
12 septembre 2006
Partant, il convient de mettre fin à l’application de l’article 29 § 3 et de rayer l’affaire du rôle.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0523DEC002806403
23 mai 2006
23 mai 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0518DEC002984903
18 mai 2006
18 mai 2006
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0711DEC001937205
11 juillet 2006
11 juillet 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0504DEC001113804
4 mai 2006
4 mai 2006
Accordingly, the application of Article 29 § 3 of the Convention to the case should de discontinued and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;FRA;FRE
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0921DEC002767604
21 septembre 2006
21 septembre 2006
En conséquence, il convient de mettre fin à l’application de l’article 29 § 3 de la Convention et de rayer l’affaire du rôle.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0906DEC007652201
6 septembre 2007
6 septembre 2007
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1020DEC002596203
20 octobre 2005
20 octobre 2005
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:1125DEC004341702
25 novembre 2004
25 novembre 2004
Accordingly, Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list.
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:0927DEC000334204
27 septembre 2007
27 septembre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officielleCASELAW;DECISIONS;ADMISSIBILITY;ENG
ECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1023DEC002205102
23 octobre 2007
23 octobre 2007
In these circumstances it considers that Article 29 § 3 of the Convention should no longer apply to the case and it should be struck out of the list in accordance with Article 37 § 1 (a) of the Convention
Source officiellePage 7 sur 25163