(Indre-et-Loire), défenderesse à la cassation ; LA COUR, composée selon l'article L. 131-6, alinéa 2, du Code de l'organisation judiciaire, en l'audience publique du 9 novembre 1993, où étaient présents

Partiellement irrecevable (Art. 35) Conditions de recevabilité;(Art. 35-1) Épuisement des voies de recours internes;Violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice

Italy   - 9961/10 Judgment 27.3.2012 [Section II] Article 34 Hinder the exercise of the right of petition Hinder the exercise of the right of petition: violation   Facts – The applicant is a

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 25.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 41.

ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 55.

Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la vie privée);Violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice du

Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la correspondance);Non-violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice

Violation de l'article 8 - Droit au respect de la vie privée et familiale (Article 8-1 - Respect de la correspondance);Non-violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice

Radiation du rôle (Article 37-1 - Radiation du rôle;Article 37-1-c - Poursuite de l'examen non justifiée);Violation de l'article 34 - Requêtes individuelles (Article 34 - Entraver l'exercice du droit de

    There has therefore been a violation of Article 3 of the Convention. II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 42.

    The case originated in an application (no. 12646/15) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

[N] relatives à l'exercice de son droit de retrait, l'arrêt retient que le retrait d'un associé fondé sur l'article 34 des statuts, qui renvoie aux dispositions des articles 27 et 28 du décret n° 69-1274

    The applicant complained that his removal to Kyrgyzstan despite the interim measures indicated by the Court under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court has breached Article 34 of the Convention.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 33.

    ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 34 OF THE CONVENTION 59.

They were also informed that failure by a Contracting State to comply with a measure indicated under Rule 39 might entail a breach of Article 34 of the Convention. B.

    The case originated in an application (no. 54436/14) against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental

    They also complained that the seizure of their case file from their lawyer’s office had been in breach of Article 34 of the Convention. 12 .