Greece (No. 2) (application no. 16163/02)   Just satisfaction The seven applicants, Maria Nastou, Alexandra Nastou, Styliani Al. Nastou, Constantina Al. Nastou, Heleni Nastou, Styliani I.

Greece and Germany, The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:   Anatoly Kovler, President,   Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos,   Erik Møse, judges

The court further considers that K.’s eviction, if ordered, would have an adverse effect on the housing rights of her daughter, who lives with her.

Georgia [GC], no. 71503/01, § 160, ECHR 2004 ‑ II), even if the Government have not raised that objection (see Walker v.

    The Government submitted that Article 13 was inapplicable, since the applicants did not have an “arguable claim” under Article 2 of the Convention. 37.

    The applicant argued that due to a fault imputable solely to the domestic courts, he had been denied the opportunity to have knowledge of, and comment on, the defendant’s submissions.

The Court has previously accepted that close relatives of applicants who have died can maintain applications concerning various aspects of Article   6 of the Convention, including non-enforcement

  1 («УМПЖХ №1», hereinafter “debtor company”) to pay 348 euros (EUR) to Ms Lisova Aleksandra Semenovna. The judgment became final on 19 August 2003. 6 .

Article   13 “Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in [the] Convention are violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority notwithstanding that the violation has been

that treatment; ● that there had been a violation of Article 5 § 1 (right to liberty and security) of the Convention on account of the fact that the applicant was arrested when it could not reasonably have

His requests did not exceed what was normally acceptable in the exercise of his defence rights and he cannot be said to have contributed in any other manner to the total length of the proceedings. 28.

In so far as members of the clergy and laity are recognised as employees, they have the statutory right to form a trade union.

As regards the allegation that by hearing evidence from the defendant the [first-instance] court would have learned that the documentation had been lost during the war and would have known from whom to

In some cases of individuals who had decided to follow rebel groups, the authorities were reported to have retaliated by burning down the houses of their relatives.

    According to the applicant, he went to Georgia to have his birth certificate reissued. 34.

You have to hear it for its full impact. As we have said, it degenerated into a shouting match from the point when the claimant first called [M.S.] ‘a Nazi’.

If I had any doubts as to the investigation into the criminal liability of Zoran Zaev [the President of SDSM], I have none any more.

    The Government argued that the applicant had not exhausted all available domestic remedies and that he should have lodged a civil action for damages against the State. 25.

In all cases the council should have a pluralistic composition, with a substantial part if not the majority of the members being judges.