Price KC, a solicitor advocate practising in London. the decision to give notice of the complaints concerning Article 10 of the Convention to the United Kingdom Government (“the Government”), represented

He is represented before the Court by Messrs Wilson & Co., solicitors practising in London. The respondent Government are represented by their agent, Mr   J.

SOCAD 32 rue d'Anjou 53320 LOIRON représentée par Maître Anne-Florence LE GOURIFF (société juridique du Maine), avocat au barreau de LAVAL INTIMEE (incidemment appelante) : Madame Isabelle

Following the massacre, the applicant attended a demonstration against the Uzbek authorities held outside the Uzbekistan embassy in London. He believes that the demonstration was video recorded.

    He is represented before the Court by Stephenson Harwood, a firm of solicitors based in London as well as by Mr J.P. Gardner, a solicitor also based in London.

Convention, given the information subsequent to the date of extradition according to which the applicant had been granted conditional release in Peru and had constantly been in touch with his counsel in London

Brady, a lawyer practising in London.

Cook, a lawyer practising in London.

The Applicant states that the convictions and sentences concerned were based, to a large extent, on ordinances issued by the Government-in-Exile in London in the years 1940 - 45.

xa0;  Having deliberated;        Decides as follows:   THE FACTS        The applicant is an Algerian citizen, born in 1965 and resident in London

Following the massacre, the applicant attended a demonstration against the Uzbek authorities held outside the Uzbekistan embassy in London. He believes that the demonstration was video recorded.

Cook, a lawyer practising in London.

    The applicant was represented by Polly Glynn, a lawyer practising in London. The United Kingdom Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr C.

Monsieur [J] [W] interprète en langue arabe inscrit sur la liste des experts de la cour d'appel de Nîmes, Vu la comparution de Monsieur [E] [X], régulièrement convoqué ; Vu la présence de Me Grégory LORION

[U] [Y] alias [B] [M], régulièrement convoqué ; Vu la présence de Me Grégory LORION, avocat de X se disant M.

Singh and Ruparell, Solicitors practising in London.   The facts, as submitted by the applicant and as apparent from the documents submitted with the application, may be summarised as follows.

AUX AFFAIRES FAMILIALES DU TRIBUNAL JUDICIAIRE DE NIMES Cab1 14 avril 2021 RG:19/01267 [R] C/ [P] Grosse délivrée le 18/05/2022 à : Me Espinouse Me Lorion

qualité d'assureur de la SAS SOCOTEC CONSTRUCTION [Adresse 14] [Localité 28] Représentées par Me Olivier LERIDON de la SCP LERIDON LACAMP, avocat au barreau de TOULOUSE SOCIETE QUEST CONSULTING (LONDON

le code de justice administrative ; Les parties ayant été régulièrement averties du jour de l'audience ; Après avoir entendu au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Bénédicte Lordonné

le code de justice administrative ; Les parties ayant été régulièrement averties du jour de l'audience ; Après avoir entendu au cours de l'audience publique : - le rapport de Mme Bénédicte Lordonné